Linux SPI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"peterhuewe@gmx.de" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" 
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V5 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Support hardware wait polling
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 13:45:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/9W+7fiRRMqw5LB@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/9VkGjCP48FHtyS@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 09:39:28AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 12:37:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > It's not like these buses are hot pluggable - someone would have to
> > design and manufacture a board which doesn't work.  It's probably
> > reasonable for this to fail with the SPI subsystem saying it can't
> > support things when the operation is tried.

> If the spi subsystem fails this request with these flags that would be
> great, it would cause the TPM to fail probing reliably.

> But does this patch do that? It looks like non-supporting half duplex
> drivers will just ignore the new flag?

That's something we can fix up in SPI, we shouldn't worry about it for
the client drivers.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-01 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-27 12:06 [Patch V5 0/3] Tegra TPM driver with HW flow control Krishna Yarlagadda
2023-02-27 12:07 ` [Patch V5 1/3] spi: Add TPM HW flow flag Krishna Yarlagadda
2023-02-27 12:07 ` [Patch V5 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Support hardware wait polling Krishna Yarlagadda
2023-02-28  2:36   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-28  3:32     ` Krishna Yarlagadda
2023-03-01 23:17       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-28 12:28     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-01 11:56       ` Krishna Yarlagadda
2023-03-01 12:27         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-01 12:37           ` Mark Brown
2023-03-01 13:39             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-01 13:45               ` Mark Brown [this message]
2023-03-01 14:09               ` Thierry Reding
2023-03-01 15:38                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-27 12:07 ` [Patch V5 3/3] spi: tegra210-quad: Enable TPM " Krishna Yarlagadda
2023-02-28  2:28 ` [Patch V5 0/3] Tegra TPM driver with HW flow control Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/9W+7fiRRMqw5LB@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kyarlagadda@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=skomatineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox