From: "Ángel Alberto Carretero" <angelalbertoc.r@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: loopback: fix up checkpath macro do while error.
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 20:22:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0af15115-9641-a1c8-f398-c4e8e77379a3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023040252-racoon-daintily-3589@gregkh>
On 02/04/2023 15:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 02:25:51PM +0200, Angel Alberto Carretero wrote:
>> Wrap macro in a do-while statement.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Angel Alberto Carretero <angelalbertoc.r@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
>> index d7b39f3bb652..371809770ed0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
>> @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ static ssize_t name##_avg_show(struct device *dev, \
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg)
>>
>> #define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \
>> - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \
>> - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \
>> - gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field)
>> + do { \
>> + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \
>> + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \
>> + gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field); \
>> + } while (0)
>>
>> #define gb_loopback_attr(field, type) \
>> static ssize_t field##_show(struct device *dev, \
>> --
>> 2.40.0
>>
>>
>
> Any specific reason why you did not test build your change before
> submitting it?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Apologies, we can drop the patch. I was trying to find an error as part
of the eudyptula challenge and thought I was compiling the driver
correctly. Upon further examination, the macro cannot be written with a
do-while because it is defining functions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-02 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-02 12:25 [PATCH] staging: greybus: loopback: fix up checkpath macro do while error Angel Alberto Carretero
2023-04-02 13:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-02 18:22 ` Ángel Alberto Carretero [this message]
2023-04-03 6:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-04-03 7:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-03 13:50 ` Ángel Alberto Carretero
2023-04-02 13:58 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-02 14:38 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0af15115-9641-a1c8-f398-c4e8e77379a3@gmail.com \
--to=angelalbertoc.r@gmail.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox