public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ángel Alberto Carretero" <angelalbertoc.r@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
	greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: loopback: fix up checkpath macro do while error.
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 20:22:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0af15115-9641-a1c8-f398-c4e8e77379a3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023040252-racoon-daintily-3589@gregkh>



On 02/04/2023 15:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 02:25:51PM +0200, Angel Alberto Carretero wrote:
>> Wrap macro in a do-while statement.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Angel Alberto Carretero <angelalbertoc.r@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 8 +++++---
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
>> index d7b39f3bb652..371809770ed0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
>> @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ static ssize_t name##_avg_show(struct device *dev,		\
>>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg)
>>   
>>   #define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field)				\
>> -	gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u);		\
>> -	gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u);		\
>> -	gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field)
>> +	do {		\
>> +		gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u);		\
>> +		gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u);		\
>> +		gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field);		\
>> +	} while (0)
>>   
>>   #define gb_loopback_attr(field, type)					\
>>   static ssize_t field##_show(struct device *dev,				\
>> -- 
>> 2.40.0
>>
>>
> 
> Any specific reason why you did not test build your change before
> submitting it?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Apologies, we can drop the patch. I was trying to find an error as part
of the eudyptula challenge and thought I was compiling the driver
correctly. Upon further examination, the macro cannot be written with a
do-while because it is defining functions.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-02 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-02 12:25 [PATCH] staging: greybus: loopback: fix up checkpath macro do while error Angel Alberto Carretero
2023-04-02 13:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-02 18:22   ` Ángel Alberto Carretero [this message]
2023-04-03  6:23     ` Dan Carpenter
2023-04-03  7:21       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-04-03 13:50         ` Ángel Alberto Carretero
2023-04-02 13:58 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-02 14:38 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0af15115-9641-a1c8-f398-c4e8e77379a3@gmail.com \
    --to=angelalbertoc.r@gmail.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox