From: Michael Rubin <matchstick@neverthere.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dpenkler@gmail.com
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Rubin <matchstick@neverthere.org>
Subject: [Patch v1 09/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_spoll_bytes_ioctl
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 05:58:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409055903.321438-10-matchstick@neverthere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409055903.321438-1-matchstick@neverthere.org>
Using Linux code style for 'struct gpib_spoll_bytes_ioctl' to remove typedef.
Adhering to Linux code style.
Reported by checkpatch.pl
In general, a pointer, or a struct that has elements that can reasonably be
directly accessed should never be a typedef.
Signed-off-by: Michael Rubin <matchstick@neverthere.org>
---
drivers/staging/gpib/common/gpib_os.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/common/gpib_os.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/common/gpib_os.c
index b215521d0ee5..79806cc51749 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/common/gpib_os.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/common/gpib_os.c
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ static int write_ioctl(struct gpib_file_private *file_priv, struct gpib_board *b
static int status_bytes_ioctl(struct gpib_board *board, unsigned long arg)
{
struct gpib_status_queue *device;
- spoll_bytes_ioctl_t cmd;
+ struct gpib_spoll_bytes_ioctl cmd;
int retval;
retval = copy_from_user(&cmd, (void __user *)arg, sizeof(cmd));
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h b/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h
index dab170b09764..e3d167edfd69 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h
@@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ struct gpib_online_ioctl {
int online;
};
-typedef struct {
+struct gpib_spoll_bytes_ioctl {
unsigned int num_bytes;
unsigned int pad;
int sad;
-} spoll_bytes_ioctl_t;
+};
typedef struct {
unsigned int pad;
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ enum gpib_ioctl {
CFCBOARDTYPE = _IOW(GPIB_CODE, 24, struct gpib_board_type_ioctl),
IBMUTEX = _IOW(GPIB_CODE, 26, int),
- IBSPOLL_BYTES = _IOWR(GPIB_CODE, 27, spoll_bytes_ioctl_t),
+ IBSPOLL_BYTES = _IOWR(GPIB_CODE, 27, struct gpib_spoll_bytes_ioctl),
IBPPC = _IOW(GPIB_CODE, 28, ppoll_config_ioctl_t),
IBBOARD_INFO = _IOR(GPIB_CODE, 29, board_info_ioctl_t),
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 5:58 [Patch v1 00/21] staging: gpib: Removing typedefs for ioctl API Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 01/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_board_type_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 8:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-04-09 8:56 ` Dave Penkler
2025-04-09 9:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 02/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_read_write_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 03/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_open_dev_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 04/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_close_dev_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 05/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_serial_poll_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 06/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_eos_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 07/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_wait_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 08/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_online_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` Michael Rubin [this message]
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 10/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_board_info_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 11/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_select_pci_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 12/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_ppoll_config_ioctl` Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 13/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_pad_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 14/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_sad_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 15/21] staging: gpib: Using gpib_select_device_path_ioctl Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 16/21] staging: gpib: Using struct gpib_request_service2 Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:58 ` [Patch v1 17/21] staging: gpib: event_ioctl_t now short Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:59 ` [Patch v1 18/21] staging: gpib: rsc_ioctl_t now int Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:59 ` [Patch v1 19/21] staging: gpib: t1_delay_ioctl_t now unsigned int Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:59 ` [Patch v1 20/21] staging: gpib: autospoll_ioctl_t now short Michael Rubin
2025-04-09 5:59 ` [Patch v1 21/21] staging: gpib: local_ppoll_mode_ioctl_t " Michael Rubin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250409055903.321438-10-matchstick@neverthere.org \
--to=matchstick@neverthere.org \
--cc=dpenkler@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox