* Re: [PATCH] staging: cleanup of sdio_intf.c
2026-05-21 18:39 [PATCH] staging: cleanup of sdio_intf.c Manuel Ebner
@ 2026-05-22 5:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2026-05-22 5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manuel Ebner
Cc: Dan Carpenter, Omer El Idrissi, open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM,
open list
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 08:39:32PM +0200, Manuel Ebner wrote:
> removed unused argument of rtw_sdio_if1_init()
> removed empty lines, added linew where appropriate
>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/sdio_intf.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/sdio_intf.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/sdio_intf.c
> index d0feb28b7043..32a0ee08f175 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/sdio_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/sdio_intf.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ static void sd_sync_int_hdl(struct sdio_func *func)
> {
> struct dvobj_priv *psdpriv;
>
> -
> psdpriv = sdio_get_drvdata(func);
>
> if (!psdpriv->if1)
> @@ -144,13 +143,13 @@ static void sdio_deinit(struct dvobj_priv *dvobj)
> sdio_claim_host(func);
> sdio_disable_func(func);
>
> - if (dvobj->irq_alloc) {
> + if (dvobj->irq_alloc)
> sdio_release_irq(func);
> - }
>
> sdio_release_host(func);
> }
> }
> +
> static struct dvobj_priv *sdio_dvobj_init(struct sdio_func *func)
> {
> struct dvobj_priv *dvobj = NULL;
> @@ -216,8 +215,7 @@ static void sd_intf_stop(struct adapter *padapter)
> rtw_hal_disable_interrupt(padapter);
> }
>
> -
> -static struct adapter *rtw_sdio_if1_init(struct dvobj_priv *dvobj, const struct sdio_device_id *pdid)
> +static struct adapter *rtw_sdio_if1_init(struct dvobj_priv *dvobj)
> {
> int status = _FAIL;
> struct net_device *pnetdev;
> @@ -250,7 +248,6 @@ static struct adapter *rtw_sdio_if1_init(struct dvobj_priv *dvobj, const struct
> /* 4 3.1 set hardware operation functions */
> rtw_set_hal_ops(padapter);
>
> -
> /* 3 5. initialize Chip version */
> padapter->intf_start = &sd_intf_start;
> padapter->intf_stop = &sd_intf_stop;
> @@ -336,9 +333,8 @@ static void rtw_sdio_if1_deinit(struct adapter *if1)
> * notes: drv_init() is called when the bus driver has located a card for us to support.
> * We accept the new device by returning 0.
> */
> -static int rtw_drv_init(
> - struct sdio_func *func,
> - const struct sdio_device_id *id)
> +static int rtw_drv_init(struct sdio_func *func,
> + const struct sdio_device_id *id)
> {
> int status = _FAIL;
> struct adapter *if1 = NULL;
> @@ -348,7 +344,7 @@ static int rtw_drv_init(
> if (!dvobj)
> goto exit;
>
> - if1 = rtw_sdio_if1_init(dvobj, id);
> + if1 = rtw_sdio_if1_init(dvobj);
> if (!if1)
> goto free_dvobj;
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- Your patch did many different things all at once, making it difficult
to review. All Linux kernel patches need to only do one thing at a
time. If you need to do multiple things (such as clean up all coding
style issues in a file/driver), do it in a sequence of patches, each
one doing only one thing. This will make it easier to review the
patches to ensure that they are correct, and to help alleviate any
merge issues that larger patches can cause.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread