Linux kernel staging patches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
Cc: "laurent.pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: WARNING: drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:364 vchiq_prepare_bulk_data
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:37:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5113a1df-858b-4ba1-bd8b-c53c0313c7ce@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c2917fa-d2ee-4d0b-b42a-a27191e93088@app.fastmail.com>

Am 11.06.24 um 13:08 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024, at 12:47, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Am 10.06.24 um 12:25 schrieb Robin Murphy:
>>> On 2024-06-10 10:24 am, Phil Elwell wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 10:20, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>>>>        Arnd
>>>> vchiq sends partial cache lines at the start and of reads (as seen
>>>> from the ARM host) out of band, so the only misaligned DMA transfers
>>>> should be from ARM to VPU. This should not require a bounce buffer.
>>> Hmm, indeed the dma_kmalloc_safe() takes into account that unaligned
>>> DMA_TO_DEVICE does not need bouncing, so it would suggest that
>>> something's off in what vchiq is asking for.
>> I'm available to debug this further, but i need more guidance here.
>>
>> At least i extend the output for the error case:
>>
>> -               WARN_ON(len == 0);
>> -               WARN_ON(i && (i != (dma_buffers - 1)) && (len &
>> ~PAGE_MASK));
>> -               WARN_ON(i && (addr & ~PAGE_MASK));
>> +               if (len == 0)
>> +                       pr_warn_once("%s: sg_dma_len() == 0\n", __func__);
>> +               else if (i && (i != (dma_buffers - 1)) && (len &
>> ~PAGE_MASK))
>> +                       pr_warn_once("%s: following block not page
>> aligned\n", __func__);
>> +               else if (i && (addr & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
>> +                       pr_warn_once("%s: block %u, DMA address %pad
>> doesn't align with PAGE_MASK 0x%lx\n", __func__, i, &addr, PAGE_MASK);
>> +                       pr_warn_once("sg_dma_is_swiotlb: %d, dma_flags:
>> %x\n", sg_dma_is_swiotlb(sg), sg->dma_flags);
>> +               }
>>
>> Example result:
>>
>> [   84.180527] create_pagelist: block 1, DMA address 0x00000000f5f74800
>> doesn't align with PAGE_MASK 0xfffffffffffff000
>> [   84.180553] sg_dma_is_swiotlb: 0, dma_flags: 0
>>
>> Is this helpful?
> It's interesting that this does not have the SG_DMA_SWIOTLB
> flag set, as the theory so far was that an unaligned
> user address is what caused this to bounce.
>
> I think the most helpful bit of information that is
> currently missing is the 'ubuf' and 'count' arguments
> that got passed down from userspace into create_pagelist(),
> to see what alignment they have in the failure case.
Here is my attempt:

         if (len == 0)
             pr_warn_once("%s: sg_dma_len() == 0\n", __func__);
         else if (i && (i != (dma_buffers - 1)) && (len & ~PAGE_MASK))
             pr_warn_once("%s: following block not page aligned\n",
__func__);
         else if (i && (addr & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
             pr_warn_once("%s: block %u, DMA address %pad doesn't align
with PAGE_MASK 0x%lx\n", __func__, i, &addr, PAGE_MASK);
             pr_warn_once("sg_dma_is_swiotlb: %d, dma_flags: %x\n",
sg_dma_is_swiotlb(sg), sg->dma_flags);
             pr_warn_once("type = %s\n", (type == PAGELIST_WRITE) ?
"PAGELIST_WRITE" : "PAGELIST_READ");
             if (buf)
                 pr_warn_once("buf = %p, count = %zu\n", buf, count);
             else
                 pr_warn_once("ubuf = %p, count = %zu\n", ubuf, count);
         }

Output:

[   66.184030] create_pagelist: block 1, DMA address 0x00000000f5fc7800
doesn't align with PAGE_MASK 0xfffffffffffff000
[   66.184056] sg_dma_is_swiotlb: 0, dma_flags: 0
[   66.184063] type = PAGELIST_READ
[   66.184066] ubuf = 00000000266a70a7, count = 0
>
>       Arnd


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-11 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-09 22:24 WARNING: drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:364 vchiq_prepare_bulk_data Stefan Wahren
2024-06-10  6:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-10  8:26   ` Phil Elwell
2024-06-10  9:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-10  9:15       ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-10  9:19         ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-10  9:24           ` Phil Elwell
2024-06-10 10:09             ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-10 10:25             ` Robin Murphy
2024-06-11 10:47               ` Stefan Wahren
2024-06-11 11:08                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-11 11:37                   ` Stefan Wahren [this message]
2024-06-11 12:14                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-11 13:09                       ` Stefan Wahren
2024-06-11 13:35                     ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5113a1df-858b-4ba1-bd8b-c53c0313c7ce@gmx.net \
    --to=wahrenst@gmx.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox