Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: fix lines exceeding 100 columns

["Salman Alghamdi" <me@cipherat.com>]

On April 27, 2026 12:10 +03, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:

> This patch is too big and too complicated.  If you send a patch that
> only adds newlines, then I have automated ways to review that but
> when you're adding variables and change code to use min_t() then
> it's hard to review.

The introduction of some variables was made in order to fix line
length for certain function calls that has long named parameters.
Should I separate long line fixes into two patches, one only for
simple newlines and the other that introduces variables?

> When you start doing things which are more complicated than
> just adding newlines, then it gets controversial in ways you
> don't expect.  For example, we don't really use min_t() these
> days.

I tried using min() first as Luka noted me, but checkpatch.pl warned
to replace it with min_t() instead. What is the preferred function
to use in this case?

Regards,
Salman Alghamdi