* [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe
@ 2026-08-07 15:09 Hui Su
2026-08-08 2:59 ` Nam Cao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hui Su @ 2026-08-07 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andy
Cc: gregkh, namcao, dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-staging,
linux-kernel, sh_def, thomas.petazzoni, notro
fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while
processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also
taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts
enabled.
Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and
console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and
enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire
dirty_lock again.
The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled:
WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock:
(console_owner){-...}-{0:0}
but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
(&par->dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&par->dirty_lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(console_owner);
lock(&par->dirty_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(console_owner);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for
fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the
IRQ-off regions remain short.
Fixes: c296d5f9957c ("staging: fbtft: core support")
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Drop the comment explaining the lock ordering in fbtft_mkdirty().
- Use spin_lock_irq() in fbtft_deferred_io(), since it runs in workqueue
context with interrupts enabled.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260804173712.176017-1-sh_def@163.com/
drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index ca0c38221c16..7925d974de80 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -298,14 +298,15 @@ static void fbtft_mkdirty(struct fb_info *info, int y, int height)
{
struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
struct fb_deferred_io *fbdefio = info->fbdefio;
+ unsigned long flags;
/* Mark display lines/area as dirty */
- spin_lock(&par->dirty_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&par->dirty_lock, flags);
if (y < par->dirty_lines_start)
par->dirty_lines_start = y;
if (y + height - 1 > par->dirty_lines_end)
par->dirty_lines_end = y + height - 1;
- spin_unlock(&par->dirty_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&par->dirty_lock, flags);
/* Schedule deferred_io to update display (no-op if already on queue)*/
schedule_delayed_work(&info->deferred_work, fbdefio->delay);
@@ -318,13 +319,13 @@ static void fbtft_deferred_io(struct fb_info *info, struct list_head *pagereflis
struct fb_deferred_io_pageref *pageref;
unsigned int y_low = 0, y_high = 0;
- spin_lock(&par->dirty_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&par->dirty_lock);
dirty_lines_start = par->dirty_lines_start;
dirty_lines_end = par->dirty_lines_end;
/* set display line markers as clean */
par->dirty_lines_start = par->info->var.yres - 1;
par->dirty_lines_end = 0;
- spin_unlock(&par->dirty_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&par->dirty_lock);
/* Mark display lines as dirty */
list_for_each_entry(pageref, pagereflist, list) {
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe
2026-08-07 15:09 [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe Hui Su
@ 2026-08-08 2:59 ` Nam Cao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2026-08-08 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hui Su, andy
Cc: gregkh, dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-staging, linux-kernel,
sh_def, thomas.petazzoni, notro
Hui Su <sh_def@163.com> writes:
> fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while
> processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also
> taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts
> enabled.
...
> Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for
> fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the
> IRQ-off regions remain short.
>
> Fixes: c296d5f9957c ("staging: fbtft: core support")
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-08 2:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-07 15:09 [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe Hui Su
2026-08-08 2:59 ` Nam Cao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox