Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 5/7] staging: vt6655: Rewrite conditional in AL7320 initialization

["Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>]

On Thursday, October 28, 2021 4:35:30 PM CEST Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 14:36 +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > As far as I know by reading some Greg K-H's replies to other
> > developers, this 
> > "<test> ? <true> : <false>" style is not well accepted here.
> 
> I thought that the expression is simple enough that it can be written
> this way. Julia nicely summarised why I think it's a good usage of the
> conditional operator. Still, there's no problem in changing it to "if-
> else" statement if that's the preferred option.

If I were you, I'd leave the patch as-is and wait for Greg review.

I was only reporting some words that I recall I read in some emails of Greg. 
But it is highly probable that those contexts were a bit different or that 
the statements were much more complex.

As far as what my personal preference is, I think that you shouldn't care 
because I'm not one of the maintainers. Above all, even if I were one of the 
maintainers I'd never prevent developers to use their own style with this 
kind of statements.

To summarize, you'd better leave the patch as-is.

Thanks,

Fabio

> 
> Thanks,
> Karolina
> > 
> 
>