From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: "Kryštof Černý" <cleverline1mc@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Add vqmmc-supply on NanoPi NEO Plus2
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 16:25:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240904162535.48640243@donnerap.manchester.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240827-nanopi-neo-plus2-regfix-v2-3-497684ec82c7@gmail.com>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 23:00:45 +0200
Kryštof Černý <cleverline1mc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adds missing vqmmc-supply for mmc2.
Does that patch actually fix anything? Does the kernel complain about the
missing vqmmc regulator?
I am asking because I wonder if we need this patch in the first place. The
generic MMC DT binding marks the vqmmc property as optional.
So I appreciate the idea of making everything neat and tidy, but after all
we have little actual proof that the voltage is really 3.3V, so I'd just
leave it as it is.
Cheers,
Andre
>
> Signed-off-by: Kryštof Černý <cleverline1mc@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo-plus2.dts | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo-plus2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo-plus2.dts
> index 526443bb736c..609560a9d6dc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo-plus2.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-neo-plus2.dts
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ &mmc2 {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_pins>;
> vmmc-supply = <®_vcc3v3>;
> + vqmmc-supply = <®_vcc3v3>;
> bus-width = <8>;
> non-removable;
> cap-mmc-hw-reset;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 21:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix regulators and assign them on NanoPi NEO Plus2 Kryštof Černý
2024-08-27 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Fix NanoPi NEO Plus2 regulators Kryštof Černý
2024-09-04 16:44 ` Andre Przywara
2024-08-27 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Use regulators for pio on NanoPi NEO Plus2 Kryštof Černý
2024-09-04 15:27 ` Andre Przywara
2024-08-27 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Add vqmmc-supply " Kryštof Černý
2024-09-04 15:25 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix regulators and assign them " Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240904162535.48640243@donnerap.manchester.arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=cleverline1mc@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox