* [PATCH v3] i2c: sun6i-p2wi: Fix device node reference leak in p2wi_probe
@ 2026-06-18 14:37 Uday Khare
2026-06-18 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Uday Khare @ 2026-06-18 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Shyti
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland, Arnd Bergmann,
Boris Brezillon, Maxime Ripard, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Uday Khare
In p2wi_probe(), the device node reference obtained via
of_get_next_available_child() is stored in childnp. This reference is
never released, causing a device node reference leak.
Fix this by calling of_node_put(childnp) on both the error and success
paths.
Fixes: 3e833490fae5 ("i2c: sunxi: add P2WI (Push/Pull 2 Wire Interface) controller support")
Signed-off-by: Uday Khare <udaykhare77@gmail.com>
---
v3:
- Revert back to manual of_node_put() because the function uses goto-based
error handling, and mixing the two styles is discouraged (reported by
Sashiko-bot).
v2:
- Use __free(device_node) and include <linux/cleanup.h> to automate the device
node reference cleanup instead of manually calling of_node_put() on error and
success paths (suggested by Chen-Yu Tsai).
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c
index dffbe776a195..7c0239f8937e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c
@@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ static int p2wi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
- struct device_node *childnp;
unsigned long parent_clk_freq;
u32 clk_freq = I2C_MAX_STANDARD_MODE_FREQ;
struct p2wi *p2wi;
@@ -217,14 +216,19 @@ static int p2wi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* In this case the target_addr is set to -1 and won't be checked when
* launching a P2WI transfer.
*/
+ struct device_node *childnp;
+
childnp = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
if (childnp) {
ret = of_property_read_u32(childnp, "reg", &target_addr);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ of_node_put(childnp);
return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
"invalid target address on node %pOF\n", childnp);
+ }
p2wi->target_addr = target_addr;
+ of_node_put(childnp);
}
p2wi->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: sun6i-p2wi: Fix device node reference leak in p2wi_probe
2026-06-18 14:37 [PATCH v3] i2c: sun6i-p2wi: Fix device node reference leak in p2wi_probe Uday Khare
@ 2026-06-18 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-18 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uday Khare; +Cc: linux-sunxi
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Calling `of_node_put(childnp)` before passing `childnp` to `dev_err_probe()` causes a use-after-free because the `%pOF` format specifier dereferences the freed node.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Hardware reset is asserted before the I2C adapter is deleted in `p2wi_remove()`, risking hangs and incomplete transfers.
- [High] The I2C transfer function `p2wi_smbus_xfer()` uses `wait_for_completion()` without a timeout, which can permanently hang the kernel task if the hardware fails.
--
commit c8d2fd420d274dc476834daabf9f1fb97be750d0
Author: Uday Khare <udaykhare77@gmail.com>
i2c: sun6i-p2wi: Fix device node reference leak in p2wi_probe
This commit addresses a device node reference leak in p2wi_probe() by calling
of_node_put() on the child node reference obtained via
of_get_next_available_child(). The fix is applied to both the success and
error paths.
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c
> index dffbe776a195d..7c0239f8937ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -217,14 +216,19 @@ static int p2wi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * In this case the target_addr is set to -1 and won't be checked when
> * launching a P2WI transfer.
> */
> + struct device_node *childnp;
> +
> childnp = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> if (childnp) {
> ret = of_property_read_u32(childnp, "reg", &target_addr);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + of_node_put(childnp);
> return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> "invalid target address on node %pOF\n", childnp);
[Severity: High]
Does calling of_node_put() before dev_err_probe() cause a use-after-free?
The %pOF format specifier in dev_err_probe() will dereference childnp to read
its full name. Since of_node_put() decrements the reference count and can
potentially free the node, accessing it immediately afterwards might lead to
a use-after-free.
Could the node be released after logging the error instead?
> + }
>
> p2wi->target_addr = target_addr;
> + of_node_put(childnp);
> }
While reviewing the above, I also noticed a couple of pre-existing issues in
the same file:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c:p2wi_remove() {
...
reset_control_assert(p2wi->rstc);
i2c_del_adapter(&p2wi->adapter);
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could asserting the hardware reset before
deleting the I2C adapter risk hanging the system?
If reset_control_assert() disables the hardware while i2c_del_adapter() is
still waiting for ongoing transfers to finish or accepting new ones, any
in-flight transfers might interact with a disabled controller. This could
lead to the driver waiting indefinitely for an interrupt.
Should i2c_del_adapter() be called before asserting the hardware reset?
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c:p2wi_smbus_xfer() {
...
writel(P2WI_CTRL_START_TRANS | P2WI_CTRL_GLOBAL_INT_ENB,
p2wi->regs + P2WI_CTRL);
wait_for_completion(&p2wi->complete);
...
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this wait_for_completion() hang the
kernel task permanently?
If the hardware fails to generate an interrupt due to a bus lockup, a missed
edge, or reset, the calling thread will block indefinitely in an
uninterruptible sleep state because there is no timeout mechanism.
Would it be safer to use wait_for_completion_timeout() and handle the
timeout condition by reporting an error and cleaning up?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260618143727.18534-1-udaykhare77@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-18 14:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-18 14:37 [PATCH v3] i2c: sun6i-p2wi: Fix device node reference leak in p2wi_probe Uday Khare
2026-06-18 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox