ARM Sunxi Platform Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Li Youhong" <dayou5941@163.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sun4i-emac: fix missing of_node_put() for phy_node
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:08:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905080854.5CAB41F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904080758.2432748-1-dayou5941@163.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unconditional call to `dma_release_channel()` with a potentially NULL pointer in the `emac_probe()` error path causes a kernel panic.
- [High] Premature release of the DMA channel before `unregister_netdev()` in `emac_remove()` creates a use-after-free race condition.
--

commit c4716a5c5ccd2a56d9acba6cfcd5d61c3d288e5f
Author: Li Youhong <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>

net: sun4i-emac: fix missing of_node_put() for phy_node

This commit fixes a reference leak on the PHY node in the sun4i-emac driver.
It adds the missing of_node_put() calls on the probe error path and during
device removal to properly decrement the reference count elevated by
of_parse_phandle().

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c
> index 942454e294882..0ba67a55705d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c
> @@ -1067,6 +1067,7 @@ static int emac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_release_sram:
> +	of_node_put(db->phy_node);
>  	sunxi_sram_release(&pdev->dev);
>  out_clk_disable_unprepare:
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(db->clk);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but just below these lines in the error
handling path of emac_probe(), the code calls:

out_dispose_mapping:
        irq_dispose_mapping(ndev->irq);
        dma_release_channel(db->rx_chan);

Can this unconditional call to dma_release_channel() cause a kernel panic
due to a NULL pointer dereference? If emac_configure_dma() fails to acquire
a DMA channel earlier in emac_probe(), it sets db->rx_chan to NULL and allows
fallback to non-DMA mode. If a subsequent step like devm_clk_get() then
fails, execution jumps to out_dispose_mapping and dereferences db->rx_chan
without checking if it is NULL.

> @@ -1094,6 +1095,7 @@ static void emac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	unregister_netdev(ndev);
> +	of_node_put(db->phy_node);
>  	sunxi_sram_release(&pdev->dev);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(db->clk);
>  	irq_dispose_mapping(ndev->irq);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at the context right above this in
emac_remove():

    if (db->rx_chan) {
        dmaengine_terminate_all(db->rx_chan);
        dma_release_channel(db->rx_chan);
    }

    unregister_netdev(ndev);

Does releasing the DMA channel before unregistering the network device create
a use-after-free race condition?

The network interface is still logically UP when dma_release_channel() is
called, meaning its IRQ handler (emac_interrupt) is active until
unregister_netdev() completes. If an incoming packet triggers a receive
interrupt in this window, the handler calls emac_rx(), which checks
if db->rx_chan is non-NULL. Since db->rx_chan is not cleared after release,
would this submit a new DMA transaction using the freed channel structure?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904080758.2432748-1-dayou5941@163.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-05  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04  8:07 [PATCH] net: sun4i-emac: fix missing of_node_put() for phy_node Li Youhong
2026-09-05  8:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-10  9:32   ` Simon Horman
2026-09-10  9:31 ` Simon Horman
2026-09-10 10:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260905080854.5CAB41F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dayou5941@163.com \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox