Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: dts: allwinner: a100: Add CPU Operating Performance Points table

[Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>]

Hi Andre,

On 5/12/25 12:46 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 11:24:07 +0200
> Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 5/11/25 3:10 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Add an Operating Performance Points table for the CPU cores to
>>> enable Dynamic Voltage & Frequency Scaling on the A100.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shuosheng Huang <huangshuosheng@allwinnertech.com>
>>> [masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest: fix typos in -cpu-opp, use compatible]
>>> Signed-off-by: Cody Eksal <masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest>
>>> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241031070232.1793078-14-masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>>>
>>> [ upstream commit: a8181e6861fec3068f393d77ff81b2aaf4ea4203 ]
>>
>> Did you use tools/update-subtree.sh to cherry-pick those commits? The
> 
> No, I didn't, just remembered that afterwards. This would only work for
> this patch anyways, since the other two DT patches are not yet merged in a
> tagged release (the last one isn't even reviewed yet), so I just added them
> here for completeness, to give people an idea of how the defconfig would
> look like and to allow compile testing.
> 

Considering you're the sunxi maintainer, I assume you wouldn't merge the 
patches knowing that they are not fitting the expected workflow so I'm 
not too worried :)

> The plan was to maybe merge the first two patches (the DRAM code and
> Kconfig bits), then wait for the DT bits to trickle in.
> 

Sounds like a plan! Have fun :)

Cheers,
Quentin