* [PATCH] drm/tegra: fix locking of SET_TILING ioctl
@ 2015-11-12 7:09 Alexandre Courbot
[not found] ` <1447312196-11470-1-git-send-email-acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Courbot @ 2015-11-12 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding, Terje Bergstrom
Cc: linux-tegra, gnurou, linux-kernel, dri-devel
drm_gem_object_unreference() now expects obj->dev->struct_mutex to be
held. Use the newly-introduced drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked()
which handles locking for us.
If we don't do this drm_gem_object_unreference() will get noisy about
struct_mutex not being held every time we call the SET_TILING ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
index cc48334ef164..c0ae89865958 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static int tegra_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *drm, void *data,
bo->tiling.mode = mode;
bo->tiling.value = value;
- drm_gem_object_unreference(gem);
+ drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(gem);
return 0;
}
--
2.6.2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1447312196-11470-1-git-send-email-acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] drm/tegra: fix locking of SET_TILING ioctl [not found] ` <1447312196-11470-1-git-send-email-acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-11-17 10:02 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-11-19 4:52 ` Alexandre Courbot 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-11-17 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandre Courbot Cc: Thierry Reding, Terje Bergstrom, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:09:56PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > drm_gem_object_unreference() now expects obj->dev->struct_mutex to be > held. Use the newly-introduced drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked() > which handles locking for us. This rule has been really old, I simply made the checking more anal in commit ef4c6270bf2867e2f8032e9614d1a8cfc6c71663 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org> Date: Thu Oct 15 09:36:25 2015 +0200 drm/gem: Check locking in drm_gem_object_unreference With the above added this is: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org> > > If we don't do this drm_gem_object_unreference() will get noisy about > struct_mutex not being held every time we call the SET_TILING ioctl. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c > index cc48334ef164..c0ae89865958 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c > @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static int tegra_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *drm, void *data, > bo->tiling.mode = mode; > bo->tiling.value = value; > > - drm_gem_object_unreference(gem); > + drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(gem); > > return 0; > } > -- > 2.6.2 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/tegra: fix locking of SET_TILING ioctl 2015-11-17 10:02 ` Daniel Vetter @ 2015-11-19 4:52 ` Alexandre Courbot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Courbot @ 2015-11-19 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandre Courbot, Thierry Reding, Terje Bergstrom, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot, Linux Kernel Mailing List, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:09:56PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> drm_gem_object_unreference() now expects obj->dev->struct_mutex to be >> held. Use the newly-introduced drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked() >> which handles locking for us. > > This rule has been really old, I simply made the checking more anal in > > commit ef4c6270bf2867e2f8032e9614d1a8cfc6c71663 > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > Date: Thu Oct 15 09:36:25 2015 +0200 > > drm/gem: Check locking in drm_gem_object_unreference > > With the above added this is: > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Thanks! Sending an updated version. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-19 4:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-12 7:09 [PATCH] drm/tegra: fix locking of SET_TILING ioctl Alexandre Courbot
[not found] ` <1447312196-11470-1-git-send-email-acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-17 10:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-19 4:52 ` Alexandre Courbot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox