From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
Timo Alho <talho@nvidia.com>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: tegra: register clocks from root to leaf
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:17:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220406151701.262056-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com> (raw)
From: Timo Alho <talho@nvidia.com>
Current clock initialization causes intermediate registering of orphan
clocks (i.e. a clock without a parent registered). CCF keeps track of
orphan clocks and any time a new clock is registered, it will loop
through the list of orphan and queries if the parent is now
available. This operation triggers a clk operation(s), which is an IPC
with BPMP-FW. Hence, due to the order of which the clock appear
currently, this causes >5000 IPC messages to be sent to BPMP-FW during
clock initialization.
Optimize the clock probing by registering clocks hierarchically from
root clock towards leafs.
Signed-off-by: Timo Alho <talho@nvidia.com>
[ Checkpatch warnings fixed by Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> ]
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c
index 6ecf18f71c32..bacaa468e114 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c
@@ -448,15 +448,29 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_probe_clocks(struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp,
return count;
}
+static unsigned int
+tegra_bpmp_clk_id_to_index(const struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *clocks,
+ unsigned int num_clocks, unsigned int id)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_clocks; i++)
+ if (clocks[i].id == id)
+ return i;
+
+ return UINT_MAX;
+}
+
static const struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *
tegra_bpmp_clk_find(const struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *clocks,
unsigned int num_clocks, unsigned int id)
{
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < num_clocks; i++)
- if (clocks[i].id == id)
- return &clocks[i];
+ i = tegra_bpmp_clk_id_to_index(clocks, num_clocks, id);
+
+ if (i < num_clocks)
+ return &clocks[i];
return NULL;
}
@@ -539,31 +553,57 @@ tegra_bpmp_clk_register(struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp,
return clk;
}
+static void tegra_bpmp_register_clocks_one(struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp,
+ struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *infos,
+ unsigned int i,
+ unsigned int count)
+{
+ unsigned int j;
+ struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *info;
+ struct tegra_bpmp_clk *clk;
+
+ if (bpmp->clocks[i]) {
+ /* already registered */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ info = &infos[i];
+ for (j = 0; j < info->num_parents; ++j) {
+ unsigned int p_id = info->parents[j];
+ unsigned int p_i = tegra_bpmp_clk_id_to_index(infos, count,
+ p_id);
+ if (p_i < count)
+ tegra_bpmp_register_clocks_one(bpmp, infos, p_i, count);
+ }
+
+ clk = tegra_bpmp_clk_register(bpmp, info, infos, count);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+ dev_err(bpmp->dev,
+ "failed to register clock %u (%s): %ld\n",
+ info->id, info->name, PTR_ERR(clk));
+ /* intentionally store the error pointer to
+ * bpmp->clocks[i] to avoid re-attempting the
+ * registration later
+ */
+ }
+
+ bpmp->clocks[i] = clk;
+}
+
static int tegra_bpmp_register_clocks(struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp,
struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *infos,
unsigned int count)
{
- struct tegra_bpmp_clk *clk;
unsigned int i;
bpmp->num_clocks = count;
- bpmp->clocks = devm_kcalloc(bpmp->dev, count, sizeof(clk), GFP_KERNEL);
+ bpmp->clocks = devm_kcalloc(bpmp->dev, count, sizeof(struct tegra_bpmp_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bpmp->clocks)
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
- struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *info = &infos[i];
-
- clk = tegra_bpmp_clk_register(bpmp, info, infos, count);
- if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
- dev_err(bpmp->dev,
- "failed to register clock %u (%s): %ld\n",
- info->id, info->name, PTR_ERR(clk));
- continue;
- }
-
- bpmp->clocks[i] = clk;
+ tegra_bpmp_register_clocks_one(bpmp, infos, i, count);
}
return 0;
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-06 15:17 Jon Hunter [this message]
2022-04-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra: replace round_rate with determine_rate Jon Hunter
2022-05-04 9:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: tegra: register clocks from root to leaf Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220406151701.262056-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=talho@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox