Linux Tegra architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
To: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR NVIDIA TEGRA"
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR NVIDIA TEGRA"
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Anand Moon" <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/2] PCI: tegra: Use readl_poll_timeout() for link status polling
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:14:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23013855.EfDdHjke4D@senjougahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250831190055.7952-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com>

On Monday, September 1, 2025 4:00 AM Anand Moon wrote:
> Replace the manual `do-while` polling loops with the readl_poll_timeout()
> helper when checking the link DL_UP and DL_LINK_ACTIVE status bits
> during link bring-up. This simplifies the code by removing the open-coded
> timeout logic in favor of the standard, more robust iopoll framework.
> The change improves readability and reduces code duplication.
> 
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 38 ++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> index 3841489198b64..8e850f7c84e40 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/irq-msi-lib.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>

There is already an iopoll.h include in this file, so this adds a duplicate.

>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -2157,37 +2158,28 @@ static bool tegra_pcie_port_check_link(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>  	value |= RP_PRIV_MISC_PRSNT_MAP_EP_PRSNT;
>  	writel(value, port->base + RP_PRIV_MISC);
>  
> -	do {
> -		unsigned int timeout = TEGRA_PCIE_LINKUP_TIMEOUT;
> -
> -		do {
> -			value = readl(port->base + RP_VEND_XP);
> -
> -			if (value & RP_VEND_XP_DL_UP)
> -				break;
> -
> -			usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> -		} while (--timeout);
> +	while (retries--) {
> +		int err;
>  
> -		if (!timeout) {
> +		err = readl_poll_timeout(port->base + RP_VEND_XP, value,
> +					 value & RP_VEND_XP_DL_UP,
> +					 1000,
> +					 TEGRA_PCIE_LINKUP_TIMEOUT * 1000);

The logic change here looks OK to me. This makes the timeout 200ms (TEGRA_PCIE_LINKUP_TIMEOUT is 200). Previously, the code looped 200 times with a 1 to 2ms sleep on each iteration. So the timeout could have been longer than 200ms previously, but not in a way that could be relied on.

> +		if (err) {
>  			dev_dbg(dev, "link %u down, retrying\n", port->index);
>  			goto retry;
>  		}
>  
> -		timeout = TEGRA_PCIE_LINKUP_TIMEOUT;
> -
> -		do {
> -			value = readl(port->base + RP_LINK_CONTROL_STATUS);
> -
> -			if (value & RP_LINK_CONTROL_STATUS_DL_LINK_ACTIVE)
> -				return true;
> -
> -			usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> -		} while (--timeout);
> +		err = readl_poll_timeout(port->base + RP_LINK_CONTROL_STATUS,
> +					 value,
> +					 value & RP_LINK_CONTROL_STATUS_DL_LINK_ACTIVE,
> +					 1000, TEGRA_PCIE_LINKUP_TIMEOUT * 1000);
> +		if (!err)
> +			return true;
>  
>  retry:
>  		tegra_pcie_port_reset(port);
> -	} while (--retries);
> +	}
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-17  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-31 19:00 [RFC v1 0/2] PCI: tegra: A couple of cleanups Anand Moon
2025-08-31 19:00 ` [RFC v1 1/2] PCI: tegra: Simplify clock handling by using clk_bulk*() functions Anand Moon
2025-09-17 13:44   ` Jon Hunter
2025-09-17 18:26     ` Anand Moon
2025-09-18  9:17       ` Jon Hunter
2025-09-18 15:06         ` Anand Moon
2025-09-18 16:46           ` Jon Hunter
2025-08-31 19:00 ` [RFC v1 2/2] PCI: tegra: Use readl_poll_timeout() for link status polling Anand Moon
2025-09-17  3:14   ` Mikko Perttunen [this message]
2025-09-17  7:45     ` Anand Moon
2025-09-18  1:25       ` Mikko Perttunen
2025-09-18  4:20         ` Anand Moon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23013855.EfDdHjke4D@senjougahara \
    --to=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox