From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4: switch to the new mount api
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:40:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d22b1b7-0091-260a-b86e-ad55a26e320e@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afa501e4-802d-e8a2-4272-4b67572c6d14@nvidia.com>
On 13/01/2022 16:10, Jon Hunter wrote:
...
> OK, I see what is happening. It appears that our test harness always
> tries to mount a device called /dev/mmcblk1. Prior to this change there
> was not kernel error generated and looking at the logs I would see ...
>
> mount: /mnt: special device /dev/mmcblk1 does not exist.
>
> Following this change, now a kernel warning is generated and I see ...
>
> [ 137.078994] /dev/mmcblk1: Can't open blockdev
> mount: /mnt: special device /dev/mmcblk1 does not exist.
>
> So there is a change in behaviour but at the same time the error looks
> correct. So sorry for the false-positive.
Looking some more, previously, mount_bdev was being called and this has ...
bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(dev_name, mode, fs_type);
if (IS_ERR(bdev))
return ERR_CAST(bdev);
And now we are calling get_tree_bdev() and this has ...
bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(fc->source, mode, fc->fs_type);
if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
errorf(fc, "%s: Can't open blockdev", fc->source);
return PTR_ERR(bdev);
}
Hence, the difference. I was interested to know what had changed.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211021114508.21407-1-lczerner@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20211021114508.21407-13-lczerner@redhat.com>
2022-01-13 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4: switch to the new mount api Jon Hunter
2022-01-13 12:08 ` Lukas Czerner
2022-01-13 15:06 ` Jon Hunter
2022-01-13 16:10 ` Jon Hunter
2022-01-14 9:40 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d22b1b7-0091-260a-b86e-ad55a26e320e@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox