Linux Tegra architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4: switch to the new mount api
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:10:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afa501e4-802d-e8a2-4272-4b67572c6d14@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0535c04a-db7c-fa10-149e-91110eb18804@nvidia.com>


On 13/01/2022 15:06, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 13/01/2022 12:08, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:29:24AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Lukas,
>>>
>>> On 21/10/2021 12:45, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>>>> Add the necessary functions for the fs_context_operations. Convert and
>>>> rename ext4_remount() and ext4_fill_super() to ext4_get_tree() and
>>>> ext4_reconfigure() respectively and switch the ext4 to use the new api.
>>>>
>>>> One user facing change is the fact that we no longer have access to the
>>>> entire string of mount options provided by mount(2) since the mount api
>>>> does not store it anywhere. As a result we can't print the options to
>>>> the log as we did in the past after the successful mount.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have noticed the following error on -next on various ARM64 
>>> platforms that
>>> we have ...
>>>
>>>   ERR KERN /dev/mmcblk1: Can't open blockdev
>>>
>>> I have bisected this, to see where this was introduced and bisect is
>>> pointing to this commit. I have not looked any further so far, but 
>>> wanted to
>>> see if you had any ideas/suggestions?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this error does not come from the ext4, but probably rather from vfs. 
>> More
>> specifically from get_tree_bdev()
>>
>>          bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(fc->source, mode, fc->fs_type);
>>          if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
>>                  errorf(fc, "%s: Can't open blockdev", fc->source);
>>                  return PTR_ERR(bdev);
>>          }
> 
> Yes, obviously this warning has been there for a while but only seen 
> after this change was made.
> 
>> I have no idea why this fails in your case. Do you know what kind of
>> error it fails with? Any oher error or warning messages preceding the 
>> one you
>> point out in the logs?
> 
> No only this one.
> 
>> I assume that this happens on mount and the device that you're trying to
>> mount contains ext4 file system? Ext4 is not the only file system
>> utilizing the new mount api, can you try the same with xfs on the device?
> 
> This is happening on a board in the test farm and so not easy to 
> reformat. Looking some more /dev/mmcblk1 is not a valid device, I only 
> see /dev/mmcblk0 from the bootlogs on this board. Hmmm, OK I will have 
> to take a closer look to see where this is coming from.


OK, I see what is happening. It appears that our test harness always 
tries to mount a device called /dev/mmcblk1. Prior to this change there 
was not kernel error generated and looking at the logs I would see ...

mount: /mnt: special device /dev/mmcblk1 does not exist.

Following this change, now a kernel warning is generated and I see ...

[  137.078994] /dev/mmcblk1: Can't open blockdev
mount: /mnt: special device /dev/mmcblk1 does not exist.

So there is a change in behaviour but at the same time the error looks 
correct. So sorry for the false-positive.

Cheers
Jon



-- 
nvpublic

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20211021114508.21407-1-lczerner@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <20211021114508.21407-13-lczerner@redhat.com>
2022-01-13 11:29   ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4: switch to the new mount api Jon Hunter
2022-01-13 12:08     ` Lukas Czerner
2022-01-13 15:06       ` Jon Hunter
2022-01-13 16:10         ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2022-01-14  9:40           ` Jon Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afa501e4-802d-e8a2-4272-4b67572c6d14@nvidia.com \
    --to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox