Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] usb: typec: ucsi_ccg: Replace ccgx to well-known regex

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>]

On 18/01/2023 09:13, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:29:25PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 17/01/2023 12:02, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 03:50:43PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> From: Wayne Chang <waynec@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> ccgx is refer to the cypress cypd4226 typec controller.
>>>> Replace ccgx to well-known regex "cypress".
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wayne Chang <waynec@nvidia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> V2 -> V4: nothing has changed
>>>> V1 -> V2: new change added for adding cypress,firmware-build
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c | 2 +-
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c
>>>> index 4bc31ed8e5bc..d6114fb8d5a9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c
>>>> @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>>    	INIT_WORK(&uc->pm_work, ccg_pm_workaround_work);
>>>>    	/* Only fail FW flashing when FW build information is not provided */
>>>> -	status = device_property_read_u16(dev, "ccgx,firmware-build",
>>>> +	status = device_property_read_u16(dev, "cypress,firmware-build",
>>>>    					  &uc->fw_build);
>>>
>>> You need to first add that property to
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c.
>>
>>
>> Looking at this some more, I wonder if we need to keep 'ccgx,firmware-build'
>> as a fallback for AMD? It is not clear to me if they implement this property
>> or not. Let me know what you think. I will still update the i2c-nvidia-gpu
>> driver. 	
> 
> AMD needs to answer to that one. Sanket, do you have that device
> property ("ccgx,firmware-build") in your ACPI tables (as _DSD device
> property) for this device?


I will resend the series now, but we can wait on Sanket's response on 
whether we pick this one up or drop it. If the rest are OK, I would like 
to get them in queued for v6.3.

Thanks
Jon

-- 
nvpublic