Re: [PATCH 07/11] dmaengine: qcom-adm: stop abusing slave_id config

[Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>]

On 25-11-21, 09:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:57 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> drivers/dma/qcom/qcom_adm.c:712:18: warning: no previous prototype for function 'adm_dma_xlate' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >    struct dma_chan *adm_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> >                     ^
> >    drivers/dma/qcom/qcom_adm.c:712:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> >    struct dma_chan *adm_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> >    ^
> >    static
> >    1 warning generated.
> 
> I noticed this mistake slipped into v2 as well, the function needs to
> be marked 'static'.
> 
> Vinod, let me know how you want me to address this. Should I just fold
> the fix (see below)
> and the final Acks into the patch and send an updated pull request, or
> do a complete v3
> submission?

I can fold this while applying, the series lgtm, I will wait a day
before applying...

Thanks

> 
>       Arnd
> 
> 8<---
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/qcom_adm.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/qcom_adm.c
> index bb338b303af6..65697bee4db0 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/qcom_adm.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/qcom_adm.c
> @@ -709,8 +709,8 @@ static void adm_channel_init(struct adm_device
> *adev, struct adm_chan *achan,
>   *
>   * Returns pointer to appropriate dma channel on success or NULL on error.
>   */
> -struct dma_chan *adm_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> -                              struct of_dma *ofdma)
> +static struct dma_chan *adm_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> +                                     struct of_dma *ofdma)
>  {
>         struct dma_device *dev = ofdma->of_dma_data;
>         struct dma_chan *chan, *candidate = NULL;

-- 
~Vinod