From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] regmap: add iopoll-like atomic polling macro
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 10:20:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae119533-6966-157a-d14b-365306907554@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107120902.GC4877@sirena.org.uk>
On 1/7/2020 5:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 03:58:09PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>> This patch adds a macro 'regmap_read_poll_timeout_atomic' that works
>> similar to 'readx_poll_timeout_atomic' defined in linux/iopoll.h; This
>> is atomic version of already available 'regmap_read_poll_timeout' macro.
> In general regmap really can't be used in atomic contexts - we do have
> options to configure a regmap so it can be used there but they're not
> the default. It'd be better if the comment mentioned this and warned
> against use with normal regmaps so people are less likely to try to use
> this in an atomic context when the regmap doesn't support that.
Oh I see.
While using regmap_read_poll_timeout() in snd_soc_dai_ops trigger
callback, I was hitting below print.
"BUG: scheduling while atomic" and kernel panic there after.
While checking the documentation on snd_soc_dai_ops, it appears
trigger() is in atomic context.
This means I cannot use regmap interface (with default configuration) in
trigger().
The above issue went away with usage of
regmap_read_poll_timeout_atomic() and now I think I just got lucky.
Also, with the limited testing, I did not see the issue in current
linux-next, where as I hit above issue in
older kernel. Has anything changed with respect to above?
Though I need to test this, I guess there is a way to use non-atomic
versions of PCM operations by setting
'nonatomic' flag in snd_pcm and continue to use
regmap_read_poll_timeout(). In that case new macro may not
be necessary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-08 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-07 10:28 [PATCH] regmap: add iopoll-like atomic polling macro Sameer Pujar
2020-01-07 12:09 ` Mark Brown
2020-01-08 4:50 ` Sameer Pujar [this message]
2020-01-08 13:36 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae119533-6966-157a-d14b-365306907554@nvidia.com \
--to=spujar@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox