* [PATCH] ring-buffer: Synchronize ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() with rb_check_pages()
@ 2024-10-11 15:28 Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:09 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2024-10-11 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML, Linux Trace Kernel; +Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, Petr Pavlu
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The rb_check_pages() scans the ring buffer sub buffers to make sure they
are valid after an update. But locks are released during the update to not
hold preemption for too long.
The ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() updates the counter used by
rb_check_pages() without any locks. But it also updates the pages. Even
though it is likely that the buffer->mutex is enough to protect this, but
since rb_check_pages() uses the cpu_buffer->reader_lock for
synchronization, take that lock as well when updating the pages and
counter in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set().
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
Note, this is based on top of:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240715145141.5528-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com/
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 696d422d5b35..0672df07b599 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -6774,6 +6774,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
}
for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
continue;
@@ -6800,11 +6801,15 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
struct buffer_page, list);
list_del_init(&cpu_buffer->reader_page->list);
+ /* Synchronize with rb_check_pages() */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+
/* The cpu_buffer pages are a link list with no head */
cpu_buffer->pages = cpu_buffer->new_pages.next;
cpu_buffer->new_pages.next->prev = cpu_buffer->new_pages.prev;
cpu_buffer->new_pages.prev->next = cpu_buffer->new_pages.next;
cpu_buffer->cnt++;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
/* Clear the new_pages list */
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpu_buffer->new_pages);
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Synchronize ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() with rb_check_pages()
2024-10-11 15:28 [PATCH] ring-buffer: Synchronize ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() with rb_check_pages() Steven Rostedt
@ 2024-10-11 17:09 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2024-10-11 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML, Linux Trace Kernel; +Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, Petr Pavlu
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:28:50 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> The rb_check_pages() scans the ring buffer sub buffers to make sure they
> are valid after an update. But locks are released during the update to not
> hold preemption for too long.
>
> The ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() updates the counter used by
> rb_check_pages() without any locks. But it also updates the pages. Even
> though it is likely that the buffer->mutex is enough to protect this, but
> since rb_check_pages() uses the cpu_buffer->reader_lock for
> synchronization, take that lock as well when updating the pages and
> counter in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set().
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
I rejected this patch as I believe the version Petr has is required.
-- Steve
> ---
> Note, this is based on top of:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240715145141.5528-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com/
>
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 696d422d5b35..0672df07b599 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -6774,6 +6774,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
> }
>
> for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
> continue;
> @@ -6800,11 +6801,15 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
> struct buffer_page, list);
> list_del_init(&cpu_buffer->reader_page->list);
>
> + /* Synchronize with rb_check_pages() */
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> +
> /* The cpu_buffer pages are a link list with no head */
> cpu_buffer->pages = cpu_buffer->new_pages.next;
> cpu_buffer->new_pages.next->prev = cpu_buffer->new_pages.prev;
> cpu_buffer->new_pages.prev->next = cpu_buffer->new_pages.next;
> cpu_buffer->cnt++;
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
>
> /* Clear the new_pages list */
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpu_buffer->new_pages);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-11 17:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-11 15:28 [PATCH] ring-buffer: Synchronize ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() with rb_check_pages() Steven Rostedt
2024-10-11 17:09 ` Steven Rostedt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox