From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: tglozar@redhat.com
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jkacur@redhat.com, lgoncalv@redhat.com,
Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:23:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011132356.28c48902@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011121015.2868751-1-tglozar@redhat.com>
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:10:14 +0200
tglozar@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
>
> Most fields of struct timerlat_top_cpu are unsigned long long, but the
> fields {irq,thread,user}_count are int (32-bit signed).
>
> This leads to overflow when tracing on a large number of CPUs for a long
> enough time:
> $ rtla timerlat top -a20 -c 1-127 -d 12h
> ...
> 0 12:00:00 | IRQ Timer Latency (us) | Thread Timer Latency (us)
> CPU COUNT | cur min avg max | cur min avg max
> 1 #43200096 | 0 0 1 2 | 3 2 6 12
> ...
> 127 #43200096 | 0 0 1 2 | 3 2 5 11
> ALL #119144 e4 | 0 5 4 | 2 28 16
>
> The average latency should be 0-1 for IRQ and 5-6 for thread, but is
> reported as 5 and 28, about 4 to 5 times more, due to the count
> overflowing when summed over all CPUs: 43200096 * 127 = 5486412192,
> however, 1191444898 (= 5486412192 mod MAX_INT) is reported instead, as
> seen on the last line of the output, and the averages are thus ~4.6
> times higher than they should be (5486412192 / 1191444898 = ~4.6).
>
> Fix the issue by changing {irq,thread,user}_count fields to unsigned
> long long, similarly to other fields in struct timerlat_top_cpu and to
> the count variable in timerlat_top_print_sum.
>
> Reported-by: Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
Thanks, I'm applying these, but could you or someone else create a test
directory in rtla and even rv that tests this code. I just examine it and
run some basic operations, but I have no idea if it is really working or not.
Having a utest directory or something would be really beneficial. That way,
I can at least run that test before I push it up to my tree.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 12:10 [PATCH 1/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long tglozar
2024-10-11 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_hist_cpu->*_count " tglozar
2024-10-11 15:10 ` John Kacur
2024-10-11 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count " John Kacur
2024-10-11 17:23 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-10-14 8:57 ` Tomas Glozar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011132356.28c48902@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=afazekas@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox