Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lgoncalv@redhat.com,  Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:09:39 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f67e508d-5d40-596e-9d98-55b9ce2c8f8e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011121015.2868751-1-tglozar@redhat.com>



On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, tglozar@redhat.com wrote:

> From: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
> 
> Most fields of struct timerlat_top_cpu are unsigned long long, but the
> fields {irq,thread,user}_count are int (32-bit signed).
> 
> This leads to overflow when tracing on a large number of CPUs for a long
> enough time:
> $ rtla timerlat top -a20 -c 1-127 -d 12h
> ...
>   0 12:00:00   |          IRQ Timer Latency (us)        |         Thread Timer Latency (us)
> CPU COUNT      |      cur       min       avg       max |      cur       min       avg       max
>  1 #43200096  |        0         0         1         2 |        3         2         6        12
> ...
> 127 #43200096  |        0         0         1         2 |        3         2         5        11
> ALL #119144 e4 |                  0         5         4 |                  2        28        16
> 
> The average latency should be 0-1 for IRQ and 5-6 for thread, but is
> reported as 5 and 28, about 4 to 5 times more, due to the count
> overflowing when summed over all CPUs: 43200096 * 127 = 5486412192,
> however, 1191444898 (= 5486412192 mod MAX_INT) is reported instead, as
> seen on the last line of the output, and the averages are thus ~4.6
> times higher than they should be (5486412192 / 1191444898 = ~4.6).
> 
> Fix the issue by changing {irq,thread,user}_count fields to unsigned
> long long, similarly to other fields in struct timerlat_top_cpu and to
> the count variable in timerlat_top_print_sum.
> 
> Reported-by: Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
> index 210b0f533534..ee7c291fc9bb 100644
> --- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
> +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
> @@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ struct timerlat_top_params {
>  };
>  
>  struct timerlat_top_cpu {
> -	int			irq_count;
> -	int			thread_count;
> -	int			user_count;
> +	unsigned long long	irq_count;
> +	unsigned long long	thread_count;
> +	unsigned long long	user_count;
>  
>  	unsigned long long	cur_irq;
>  	unsigned long long	min_irq;
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void timerlat_top_print(struct osnoise_tool *top, int cpu)
>  	/*
>  	 * Unless trace is being lost, IRQ counter is always the max.
>  	 */
> -	trace_seq_printf(s, "%3d #%-9d |", cpu, cpu_data->irq_count);
> +	trace_seq_printf(s, "%3d #%-9llu |", cpu, cpu_data->irq_count);
>  
>  	if (!cpu_data->irq_count) {
>  		trace_seq_printf(s, "%s %s %s %s |", no_value, no_value, no_value, no_value);
> -- 
> 2.47.0
> 
> 
> 
Reviewed by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Tested by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-11 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-11 12:10 [PATCH 1/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long tglozar
2024-10-11 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_hist_cpu->*_count " tglozar
2024-10-11 15:10   ` John Kacur
2024-10-11 15:09 ` John Kacur [this message]
2024-10-11 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count " Steven Rostedt
2024-10-14  8:57   ` Tomas Glozar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f67e508d-5d40-596e-9d98-55b9ce2c8f8e@redhat.com \
    --to=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=afazekas@redhat.com \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox