From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, mattbobrowski@google.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
jiang.biao@linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/10] bpf: add kfunc bpf_fsession_cookie for TRACING SESSION
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 16:01:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251022080159.553805-4-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251022080159.553805-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Add the kfunc bpf_fsession_cookie(), which is similar to
bpf_session_cookie() and return the address of the session cookie. The
address of the session cookie is stored after session flags, which means
ctx[nr_args + 2].
Inline this kfunc in the verifier too.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3f6cad5df2db..83d5d4d3120d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1735,6 +1735,7 @@ struct bpf_prog {
enforce_expected_attach_type:1, /* Enforce expected_attach_type checking at attach time */
call_get_stack:1, /* Do we call bpf_get_stack() or bpf_get_stackid() */
call_get_func_ip:1, /* Do we call get_func_ip() */
+ call_session_cookie:1, /* Do we call bpf_fsession_cookie() */
tstamp_type_access:1, /* Accessed __sk_buff->tstamp_type */
sleepable:1; /* BPF program is sleepable */
enum bpf_prog_type type; /* Type of BPF program */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a4d0dd4440fd..ab46e5fbc7a6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12294,6 +12294,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_signal,
KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_resume,
KF_bpf_tracing_is_exit,
+ KF_bpf_fsession_cookie,
};
BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
@@ -12367,6 +12368,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, __bpf_trap)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_signal)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_resume)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_tracing_is_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_fsession_cookie)
static bool is_task_work_add_kfunc(u32 func_id)
{
@@ -12422,7 +12424,8 @@ get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
bool arg_mem_size = false;
if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx] ||
- meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_tracing_is_exit])
+ meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_tracing_is_exit] ||
+ meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_fsession_cookie])
return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CTX;
/* In this function, we verify the kfunc's BTF as per the argument type,
@@ -13915,7 +13918,8 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
}
}
- if (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_session_cookie]) {
+ if (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_session_cookie] ||
+ meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_fsession_cookie]) {
meta.r0_size = sizeof(u64);
meta.r0_rdonly = false;
}
@@ -14196,6 +14200,9 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return err;
}
+ if (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_fsession_cookie])
+ env->prog->call_session_cookie = true;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -22007,6 +22014,15 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
insn_buf[4] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
insn_buf[5] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1);
*cnt = 6;
+ } else if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_fsession_cookie]) {
+ /* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
+ insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
+ /* add rax, 2 */
+ insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 2);
+ insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_0, 3);
+ insn_buf[3] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
+ insn_buf[4] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
+ *cnt = 5;
}
if (env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].arg_prog) {
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index d0720d850621..4a8568bd654d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3370,10 +3370,20 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_tracing_is_exit(void *ctx)
return ((u64 *)ctx)[nr_args + 1] & 1;
}
+__bpf_kfunc u64 *bpf_fsession_cookie(void *ctx)
+{
+ /* This helper call is inlined by verifier. */
+ u64 nr_args = ((u64 *)ctx)[-1];
+
+ /* ctx[nr_args + 2] is the session cookie address */
+ return (u64 *)((u64 *)ctx)[nr_args + 2];
+}
+
__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
BTF_KFUNCS_START(tracing_kfunc_set_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_tracing_is_exit, KF_FASTCALL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_fsession_cookie, KF_FASTCALL)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(tracing_kfunc_set_ids)
static int bpf_tracing_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
--
2.51.1.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 8:01 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] bpf: tracing session supporting Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/10] bpf: add tracing session support Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/10] bpf: add kfunc bpf_tracing_is_exit for TRACE_SESSION Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/10] bpf,x86: add ret_off to invoke_bpf() Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/10] bpf,x86: add tracing session supporting for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/10] libbpf: add support for tracing session Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/10] selftests/bpf: test get_func_ip for fsession Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 14:11 ` Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] bpf: tracing session supporting Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251022080159.553805-4-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox