From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, mattbobrowski@google.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
jiang.biao@linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/10] selftests/bpf: test get_func_ip for fsession
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 16:01:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251022080159.553805-8-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251022080159.553805-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
As the layout of the stack changed for fsession, we'd better test
bpf_get_func_ip() for it.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c | 2 ++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
index c40242dfa8fb..a9078a1dbb07 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static void test_function_entry(void)
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test7_result, 1, "test7_result");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test8_result, 1, "test8_result");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test9_result1, 1, "test9_result1");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test9_result2, 1, "test9_result2");
cleanup:
get_func_ip_test__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
index 2011cacdeb18..9acb79fc7537 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -103,3 +103,17 @@ int BPF_URETPROBE(test8, int ret)
test8_result = (const void *) addr == (const void *) uprobe_trigger;
return 0;
}
+
+__u64 test9_result1 = 0;
+__u64 test9_result2 = 0;
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test9, int a)
+{
+ __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+ if (bpf_tracing_is_exit(ctx))
+ test9_result1 = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
+ else
+ test9_result2 = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.51.1.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 8:01 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] bpf: tracing session supporting Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/10] bpf: add tracing session support Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/10] bpf: add kfunc bpf_tracing_is_exit for TRACE_SESSION Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/10] bpf: add kfunc bpf_fsession_cookie for TRACING SESSION Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/10] bpf,x86: add ret_off to invoke_bpf() Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/10] bpf,x86: add tracing session supporting for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/10] libbpf: add support for tracing session Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:01 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2025-10-22 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/10] selftests/bpf: test get_func_ip for fsession Menglong Dong
2025-10-22 8:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] bpf: tracing session supporting Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251022080159.553805-8-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox