* [PATCH] trace: use strscpy() instead of strcpy() in trace_sched_switch
@ 2026-07-05 17:36 Po-Sheng Lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Po-Sheng Lin @ 2026-07-05 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt, mhiramat
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Po-Sheng Lin
Replace strcpy() with strscpy() in __trace_find_cmdline() for
consistency with the existing strscpy() call in the same function,
and to avoid potential buffer overflow as flagged by the Kernel
Self Protection Project.
Signed-off-by: Po-Sheng Lin <posheng.lin.tw@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
index e9f0ff9626600..1bd351c1fbfb5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
@@ -286,12 +286,12 @@ static void __trace_find_cmdline(int pid, char comm[])
int tpid;
if (!pid) {
- strcpy(comm, "<idle>");
+ strscpy(comm, "<idle>", TASK_COMM_LEN);
return;
}
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pid < 0)) {
- strcpy(comm, "<XXX>");
+ strscpy(comm, "<XXX>", TASK_COMM_LEN);
return;
}
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static void __trace_find_cmdline(int pid, char comm[])
return;
}
}
- strcpy(comm, "<...>");
+ strscpy(comm, "<...>", TASK_COMM_LEN);
}
void trace_find_cmdline(int pid, char comm[])
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-07-05 17:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-05 17:36 [PATCH] trace: use strscpy() instead of strcpy() in trace_sched_switch Po-Sheng Lin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox