From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a buffer_data_read_page
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 13:56:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813135613.BD3A11F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813131152.3589632-4-vdonnefort@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] `ring_buffer_alloc_read_page()` returning a cached page with an obsolete order causes `tracing_buffers_read()` to permanently return EOF to userspace.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v5 03/10] ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a buffer_data_read_page ---
commit 19f06657067d8dbcf108f6bacc6885d031739166
Author: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a buffer_data_read_page
This commit changes the free_page cache to store the page order alongside
the page address. This fixes a mismatch when a cached reader page is
discarded after a concurrent ring buffer resize changes the global
subbuf_order.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index ec4f5a0c93e85..b6fa258aafe2c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -6962,9 +6962,9 @@ ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> local_irq_save(flags);
> arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
>
> - if (cpu_buffer->free_page) {
> - bpage->data = cpu_buffer->free_page;
> - cpu_buffer->free_page = NULL;
> + if (cpu_buffer->free_page.data) {
> + *bpage = cpu_buffer->free_page;
> + cpu_buffer->free_page.data = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does this struct assignment cause tracing_buffers_read() to permanently
return EOF to userspace during a concurrent resize?
When a resize happens in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(),
buffer->subbuf_order is updated first:
buffer->subbuf_order = order;
/* Make sure all new buffers are allocated, before deleting... */
for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
This opens a large race window before cpu_buffer->free_page.data is
cleared for each CPU.
If a user reads from trace_pipe_raw during this window,
ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() allocates bpage and initially sets
bpage->order to the new buffer->subbuf_order. However, the struct
assignment *bpage = cpu_buffer->free_page copies the old free_page,
overwriting bpage->order with the old order.
Later in tracing_buffers_read(), the caller caches this mismatched page
and sets spare_size to the new size:
} else {
info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file;
info->spare_size = page_size;
}
Because the orders don't match, ring_buffer_read_page() rejects the page:
if (data_page->order != buffer->subbuf_order)
return -1;
This returns -1, which tracing_buffers_read() treats as EOF. Subsequent
reads see info->spare_size == page_size, reuse the bad page, and
permanently return EOF.
> }
>
> arch_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813131152.3589632-1-vdonnefort@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 13:11 [PATCH v5 00/10] ring-buffer: Fixes for subbuf resizing and persistent buffers Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] ring-buffer: Free cpu_buffer::free_page with subbuf_order Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 15:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-13 16:02 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 16:03 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 16:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] ring-buffer: Hold cpu_buffer::lock when resizing a subbuf Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a buffer_data_read_page Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] ring-buffer: Fix subbuf resize race with ring buffer readers Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] ring-buffer: Fix subbuf resize race with ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with trace_pipe_raw readers Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] ring-buffer: Dynamically calculate max_data_size Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] ring-buffer: Remove trace_buffer::cpus Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] ring-buffer: Remove ring_buffer_per_cpu::mapped Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] ring-buffer: Make nr_pages unsigned int Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-13 13:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813135613.BD3A11F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox