From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, eddyz87@gmail.com, songliubraving@fb.com,
yhs@fb.com, menglong8.dong@gmail.com, rostedt@kernel.org,
martin.lau@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 04/28] bpf: Use mutex lock pool for bpf trampolines
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:54:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec7YxWrZnJDzoCI@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53b3e6cb10e12555d3b1b321eeb4e04a447c707c387568d1e9ef759fb6459ef4@mail.kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 08:10:24PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,34 @@ #define TRAMPOLINE_TABLE_SIZE (1 << TRAMPOLINE_HASH_BITS)
> > /* serializes access to trampoline tables */
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(trampoline_mutex);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * We keep 32 trampoline locks (5 bits) in the pool, because there is
> > + * 48 (MAX_LOCK_DEPTH) locks limit allowed to be simultaneously held
> > + * by task. Each lock has its own lockdep key to keep it simple.
> > + */
>
> The comment explains the 32 count (MAX_LOCK_DEPTH limit), but should it
> also explain why each lock has its own lock_class_key?
>
> Without that explanation, it is not obvious that distinct keys are required
> to avoid lockdep "recursive locking" warnings when trampoline_lock_all()
> acquires all 32 pool mutexes simultaneously.
>
> This was raised by bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org in v3 review:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/31ae46274a3157f2b9840e1a09b2698d1ec0cfd461737ff460c2d3349a9f0054@mail.kernel.org/
>
> The author acknowledged it with "will add", but the current comment only
> says "to keep it simple" without addressing the recursive locking concern.
will add more details
jirka
>
> > +#define TRAMPOLINE_LOCKS_BITS 5
> > +#define TRAMPOLINE_LOCKS_TABLE_SIZE (1 << TRAMPOLINE_LOCKS_BITS)
> > +
> > +static struct {
> > + struct mutex mutex;
> > + struct lock_class_key key;
> > +} trampoline_locks[TRAMPOLINE_LOCKS_TABLE_SIZE];
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/24583317711
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 19:24 [PATCHv5 bpf-next 00/28] bpf: tracing_multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 01/28] ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_count function Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 6:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 02/28] ftrace: Add ftrace_hash_remove function Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 6:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 03/28] ftrace: Add add_ftrace_hash_entry function Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 04/28] bpf: Use mutex lock pool for bpf trampolines Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 20:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:54 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-04-18 6:49 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 05/28] bpf: Add struct bpf_trampoline_ops object Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 06/28] bpf: Move trampoline image setup into bpf_trampoline_ops callbacks Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 20:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 6:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 07/28] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_add/remove_prog functions Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 08/28] bpf: Add struct bpf_tramp_node object Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 20:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-18 6:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 09/28] bpf: Factor fsession link to use struct bpf_tramp_node Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 10/28] bpf: Add multi tracing attach types Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 20:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 6:49 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 11/28] bpf: Move sleepable verification code to btf_id_allow_sleepable Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 12/28] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_attach/detach functions Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 20:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 6:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 13/28] bpf: Add support for tracing multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 14/28] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link cookies Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 15/28] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link session Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 16/28] bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link fdinfo Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 17/28] libbpf: Add bpf_object_cleanup_btf function Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 18/28] libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for tracing_multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 19/28] libbpf: Add btf_type_is_traceable_func function Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 5:59 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 20/28] libbpf: Add support to create tracing multi link Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 6:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 21/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi skel/pattern/ids attach tests Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 20:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-21 8:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-18 6:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 22/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi skel/pattern/ids module " Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 23/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi intersect tests Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 24/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi cookies test Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:24 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 25/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi session test Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:25 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 26/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach fails test Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:25 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 27/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach benchmark test Jiri Olsa
2026-04-17 19:25 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 28/28] selftests/bpf: Add tracing multi attach rollback tests Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aec7YxWrZnJDzoCI@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox