From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Bunyod Suvonov <b.suvonov@sjtu.edu.cn>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, david@kernel.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, ljs@kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: add balance_pgdat begin/end tracepoints
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:46:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aepavbLy7H3odp6p@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423103753.546582-1-b.suvonov@sjtu.edu.cn>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 06:37:53PM +0800, Bunyod Suvonov wrote:
> Vmscan has six main reclaim entry points: try_to_free_pages() for
> direct reclaim, try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() for memcg reclaim,
> mem_cgroup_shrink_node() for memcg soft limit reclaim, node_reclaim()
> for node reclaim, shrink_all_memory() for hibernation reclaim, and
> balance_pgdat() for kswapd reclaim.
>
> All of them, except for shrink_all_memory() and balance_pgdat(), already
> have begin/end tracepoints. This makes it harder to trace which reclaim
> path is responsible for memory reclaim activity, because kswapd reclaim
> cannot be identified as cleanly as other reclaim entry points, even
> though it is the main background reclaim path under memory pressure.
> There may be no need to trace shrink_all_memory() as it is primarily
> used during hibernation. So this patch adds the missing tracepoint pair
> for balance_pgdat().
>
> The begin tracepoint records the node id, requested reclaim order, and
> highest_zoneidx. The end tracepoint records the node id, reclaim order
> that balance_pgdat() finished with, highest_zoneidx, and nr_reclaimed.
Do we need to trace highest_zoneidx at the end? Can it change within
balance_pgdat()?
> Together, they show the requested reclaim order and zone bound, whether
> reclaim fell back to a lower order, and how much reclaim work was done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bunyod Suvonov <b.suvonov@sjtu.edu.cn>
Overall looks good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 10:37 [PATCH] mm/vmscan: add balance_pgdat begin/end tracepoints Bunyod Suvonov
2026-04-23 17:46 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-04-24 0:46 ` SUVONOV BUNYOD
2026-04-24 2:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-04-24 3:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Bunyod Suvonov
2026-04-24 3:16 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aepavbLy7H3odp6p@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=b.suvonov@sjtu.edu.cn \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox