From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 13:44:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aif8jkUPst-tTskE@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZiFUeFa4fdghuSGpqiEzyvJVxs6TDgJd5U4hSj--imiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 01:46:39PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 1:59 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Andrii reported an issue with optimized uprobes [1] that can clobber
> > redzone area with call instruction storing return address on stack
> > where user code may keep temporary data without adjusting rsp.
> >
> > Fixing this by moving the optimized uprobes on top of 10-bytes nop
> > instruction, so we can squeeze another instruction to escape the
> > redzone area before doing the call, like:
> >
> > lea -0x80(%rsp), %rsp
> > call tramp
> >
> > Note the lea instruction is used to adjust the rsp register without
> > changing the flags.
> >
> > We use nop10 and following transformation to optimized instructions
> > above and back as suggested by Peterz [2].
> >
> > Optimize path (int3_update_optimize):
> >
> > 1) Initial state after set_swbp() installed the uprobe:
> > cc 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
> >
> > From offset 0 this is INT3 followed by the tail of the original
> > 10-byte NOP.
> >
> > After a previous unoptimization bytes 5..9 may still contain the
> > old call instruction, which remains valid for threads already there.
> >
> > 2) Rewrite the LEA tail and call displacement:
> > cc [8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3]
> >
> > From offset 0 this traps on the uprobe INT3. Bytes 1..9 are not
> > executable entry points while byte 0 is trapped.
> >
> > 3) Publish the first LEA byte:
> > [48] 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> > From offset 0 this is:
> > lea -0x80(%rsp), %rsp
> > call <uprobe-trampoline>
> >
> > Unoptimize path (int3_update_unoptimize):
> >
> > 1) Initial optimized state:
> > 48 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> > Same as 3) above.
> >
> > 2) Trap new entries before restoring the NOP bytes:
> > [cc] 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> > From offset 0 this traps. A thread that had already executed the
> > LEA can still reach the intact CALL at offset 5.
> >
> > 3) Restore bytes 1..4 of the original NOP while keeping byte 0 trapped
> > and byte 5 as CALL.
> > cc [2e 0f 1f 84] e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> > From offset 0 this still traps. Offset 5 is still the CALL for any
> > thread that was already past the first LEA byte.
> >
> > 4) Publish the first byte of the original NOP:
> > [66] 2e 0f 1f 84 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> > From offset 0 this is the restored 10-byte NOP; the CALL opcode and
> > displacement are now only NOP operands. Offset 5 still decodes as
> > CALL for a thread that was already there.
> >
> > Tthere is only a single target uprobe-trampoline for the given nop10
> > instruction address, so the CALL instruction will not be changed across
> > unoptimization/optimization cycles.
> > Therefore, any task that is preempted at the CALL instruction is guaranteed
> > to observe that CALL and not anything else.
> >
> > Note as explained in [2] we need to use following nop10:
> > PF1 PF2 ESC NOPL MOD SIB DISP32
> > NOP10: 0x66, 0x2e, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 -- cs nopw 0x00000000(%rax,%rax,1)
> >
> > which means we need to allow 0x2e prefix which maps to INAT_PFX_CS
> > attribute in is_prefix_bad function.
> >
> > Also changing the uprobe syscall error when called out of uprobe
> > trampoline to -EPROTO, so we are able to detect the fixed kernel.
> >
> > The optimized uprobe performance stays the same:
> >
> > uprobe-nop : 3.129 ± 0.013M/s
> > uprobe-push : 3.045 ± 0.006M/s
> > uprobe-ret : 1.095 ± 0.004M/s
> > --> uprobe-nop10 : 7.170 ± 0.020M/s
> > uretprobe-nop : 2.143 ± 0.021M/s
> > uretprobe-push : 2.090 ± 0.000M/s
> > uretprobe-ret : 0.942 ± 0.000M/s
> > --> uretprobe-nop10: 3.381 ± 0.003M/s
> > usdt-nop : 3.245 ± 0.004M/s
> > --> usdt-nop10 : 7.256 ± 0.023M/s
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260509003146.976844-1-andrii@kernel.org/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260518104306.GU3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/#t
> > Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260509003146.976844-1-andrii@kernel.org/
> > Fixes: ba2bfc97b462 ("uprobes/x86: Add support to optimize uprobes")
> > Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.5
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 255 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 190 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -943,13 +1026,31 @@ static int int3_update(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > smp_text_poke_sync_each_cpu();
> >
> > /*
> > - * Write first byte.
> > + * 3) Restore bytes 1..4 of the original NOP while keeping byte 0 trapped
> > + * and byte 5 as CALL:
> > + * cc [2e 0f 1f 84] e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> > + */
> > + ctx.expect = EXPECT_SWBP_OPTIMIZED;
> > + err = uprobe_write(auprobe, vma, vaddr + 1, insn + 1,
> > + LEA_INSN_SIZE - 1, verify_insn,
> > + true /* is_register */, false /* do_update_ref_ctr */,
>
> tbh, it's quite subtle and non-obvious why is_register should be set
> to true first two times (and especially that is_register and
> do_update_ref_ctr are implicitly connected), not sure how to make it
> cleaner, but maybe leave a short comment explaining this twice
> register, once unregister sequence?
ok, I came up with comment below
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index de544516ea70..92449f34c005 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -1011,6 +1011,12 @@ static int int3_update_unoptimize(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct vm_area_st
int err;
/*
+ * Note the first two uprobe_write calls use is_register=true, because they
+ * are intermediate patching states while the probe is still active.
+ *
+ * The last uprobe_write to nop10 instruction is called with is_register=false
+ * and do_update_ref_ctr=true to trigger the refctr update.
+ *
* 1) Initial optimized state:
* 48 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 20:58 [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 01/13] uprobes/x86: Use proper mm_struct in __in_uprobe_trampoline Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 02/13] uprobes/x86: Remove struct uprobe_trampoline object Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-01 8:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 03/13] uprobes/x86: Allow to copy uprobe trampolines on fork Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 04/13] uprobes/x86: Unmap trampoline vma object in case it's unused Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-09 11:44 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 06/13] libbpf: Change has_nop_combo to work on top of nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 07/13] libbpf: Detect uprobe syscall with new error Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 08/13] selftests/bpf: Emit nop,nop10 instructions combo for x86_64 arch Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 09/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe syscall tests to use nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:30 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 10/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe/usdt trigger bench code " Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add reattach tests for uprobe syscall Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 11:32 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-28 11:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for uprobe nop10 red zone clobbering Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 10:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 12:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for forked/cloned optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 13:00 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-01 8:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-04 6:59 ` [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aif8jkUPst-tTskE@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox