Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 13:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aif8jkUPst-tTskE@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZiFUeFa4fdghuSGpqiEzyvJVxs6TDgJd5U4hSj--imiQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 01:46:39PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 1:59 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Andrii reported an issue with optimized uprobes [1] that can clobber
> > redzone area with call instruction storing return address on stack
> > where user code may keep temporary data without adjusting rsp.
> >
> > Fixing this by moving the optimized uprobes on top of 10-bytes nop
> > instruction, so we can squeeze another instruction to escape the
> > redzone area before doing the call, like:
> >
> >   lea -0x80(%rsp), %rsp
> >   call tramp
> >
> > Note the lea instruction is used to adjust the rsp register without
> > changing the flags.
> >
> > We use nop10 and following transformation to optimized instructions
> > above and back as suggested by Peterz [2].
> >
> > Optimize path (int3_update_optimize):
> >
> >   1) Initial state after set_swbp() installed the uprobe:
> >       cc 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
> >
> >      From offset 0 this is INT3 followed by the tail of the original
> >      10-byte NOP.
> >
> >      After a previous unoptimization bytes 5..9 may still contain the
> >      old call instruction, which remains valid for threads already there.
> >
> >   2) Rewrite the LEA tail and call displacement:
> >       cc [8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3]
> >
> >      From offset 0 this traps on the uprobe INT3.  Bytes 1..9 are not
> >      executable entry points while byte 0 is trapped.
> >
> >   3) Publish the first LEA byte:
> >       [48] 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> >      From offset 0 this is:
> >         lea -0x80(%rsp), %rsp
> >         call <uprobe-trampoline>
> >
> > Unoptimize path (int3_update_unoptimize):
> >
> >   1) Initial optimized state:
> >       48 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >      Same as 3) above.
> >
> >   2) Trap new entries before restoring the NOP bytes:
> >       [cc] 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> >      From offset 0 this traps. A thread that had already executed the
> >      LEA can still reach the intact CALL at offset 5.
> >
> >   3) Restore bytes 1..4 of the original NOP while keeping byte 0 trapped
> >      and byte 5 as CALL.
> >       cc [2e 0f 1f 84] e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> >      From offset 0 this still traps. Offset 5 is still the CALL for any
> >      thread that was already past the first LEA byte.
> >
> >   4) Publish the first byte of the original NOP:
> >       [66] 2e 0f 1f 84 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> >
> >      From offset 0 this is the restored 10-byte NOP; the CALL opcode and
> >      displacement are now only NOP operands.  Offset 5 still decodes as
> >      CALL for a thread that was already there.
> >
> >      Tthere is only a single target uprobe-trampoline for the given nop10
> >      instruction address, so the CALL instruction will not be changed across
> >      unoptimization/optimization cycles.
> >      Therefore, any task that is preempted at the CALL instruction is guaranteed
> >      to observe that CALL and not anything else.
> >
> > Note as explained in [2] we need to use following nop10:
> >        PF1   PF2   ESC   NOPL  MOD   SIB   DISP32
> > NOP10: 0x66, 0x2e, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 -- cs nopw 0x00000000(%rax,%rax,1)
> >
> > which means we need to allow 0x2e prefix which maps to INAT_PFX_CS
> > attribute in is_prefix_bad function.
> >
> > Also changing the uprobe syscall error when called out of uprobe
> > trampoline to -EPROTO, so we are able to detect the fixed kernel.
> >
> > The optimized uprobe performance stays the same:
> >
> >         uprobe-nop     :    3.129 ± 0.013M/s
> >         uprobe-push    :    3.045 ± 0.006M/s
> >         uprobe-ret     :    1.095 ± 0.004M/s
> >   -->   uprobe-nop10   :    7.170 ± 0.020M/s
> >         uretprobe-nop  :    2.143 ± 0.021M/s
> >         uretprobe-push :    2.090 ± 0.000M/s
> >         uretprobe-ret  :    0.942 ± 0.000M/s
> >   -->   uretprobe-nop10:    3.381 ± 0.003M/s
> >         usdt-nop       :    3.245 ± 0.004M/s
> >   -->   usdt-nop10     :    7.256 ± 0.023M/s
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260509003146.976844-1-andrii@kernel.org/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260518104306.GU3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/#t
> > Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260509003146.976844-1-andrii@kernel.org/
> > Fixes: ba2bfc97b462 ("uprobes/x86: Add support to optimize uprobes")
> > Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.5
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 255 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 190 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -943,13 +1026,31 @@ static int int3_update(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >         smp_text_poke_sync_each_cpu();
> >
> >         /*
> > -        * Write first byte.
> > +        * 3) Restore bytes 1..4 of the original NOP while keeping byte 0 trapped
> > +        *    and byte 5 as CALL:
> > +        *    cc [2e 0f 1f 84] e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
> > +        */
> > +       ctx.expect = EXPECT_SWBP_OPTIMIZED;
> > +       err = uprobe_write(auprobe, vma, vaddr + 1, insn + 1,
> > +                          LEA_INSN_SIZE - 1, verify_insn,
> > +                          true /* is_register */, false /* do_update_ref_ctr */,
> 
> tbh, it's quite subtle and non-obvious why is_register should be set
> to true first two times (and especially that is_register and
> do_update_ref_ctr are implicitly connected), not sure how to make it
> cleaner, but maybe leave a short comment explaining this twice
> register, once unregister sequence?

ok, I came up with comment below

thanks,
jirka


---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index de544516ea70..92449f34c005 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -1011,6 +1011,12 @@ static int int3_update_unoptimize(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct vm_area_st
 	int err;
 
 	/*
+	 * Note the first two uprobe_write calls use is_register=true, because they
+	 * are intermediate patching states while the probe is still active.
+	 *
+	 * The last uprobe_write to nop10 instruction is called with is_register=false
+	 * and do_update_ref_ctr=true to trigger the refctr update.
+	 *
 	 * 1) Initial optimized state:
 	 *    48 8d 64 24 80 e8 d0 d1 d2 d3
 	 *

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-26 20:58 [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 01/13] uprobes/x86: Use proper mm_struct in __in_uprobe_trampoline Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 02/13] uprobes/x86: Remove struct uprobe_trampoline object Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:58     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-01  8:31       ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 03/13] uprobes/x86: Allow to copy uprobe trampolines on fork Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:58     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 04/13] uprobes/x86: Unmap trampoline vma object in case it's unused Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:57     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-09 11:44     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 06/13] libbpf: Change has_nop_combo to work on top of nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:57     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 07/13] libbpf: Detect uprobe syscall with new error Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 08/13] selftests/bpf: Emit nop,nop10 instructions combo for x86_64 arch Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 09/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe syscall tests to use nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:58     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:30   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 10/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe/usdt trigger bench code " Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:46   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add reattach tests for uprobe syscall Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 11:32   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-28 11:10     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for uprobe nop10 red zone clobbering Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 10:26     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 12:46   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for forked/cloned optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 13:00   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-01  8:31     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-04  6:59 ` [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aif8jkUPst-tTskE@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox