From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:48:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akPXPhXIf6Vz76Xc@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akKf511eknMCE0AB@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/29, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > @@ -265,6 +265,10 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
> >
> > attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
> > switch (attr) {
> > + case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
> > + if (insn->x86_64)
> > + break;
> > + fallthrough;
> > case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_ES):
> > case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_DS):
> > case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_SS):
> >
> > or we could just skip it for nop10.. maybe that's better
>
> Well, if you ask me I'd agree with the "maybe that's better" plan ;)
> I mean... I don't think that INAT_PFX_CS should be "special" in is_prefix_bad.
>
> But, whatever you do - I agree, feel free to keep my r-b.
I ended up with the bigger change below, wdyt?
jirka
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 92626fce06a9..521a120a0c78 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
switch (attr) {
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_ES):
+ case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_DS):
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_SS):
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_LOCK):
@@ -275,15 +276,9 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
return false;
}
-static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn, bool x86_64)
+static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
{
- enum insn_mode m = x86_64 ? INSN_MODE_64 : INSN_MODE_32;
u32 volatile *good_insns;
- int ret;
-
- ret = insn_decode(insn, auprobe->insn, sizeof(auprobe->insn), m);
- if (ret < 0)
- return -ENOEXEC;
if (is_prefix_bad(insn))
return -ENOTSUPP;
@@ -292,7 +287,7 @@ static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn, bool
if (insn_masking_exception(insn))
return -ENOTSUPP;
- if (x86_64)
+ if (insn->x86_64)
good_insns = good_insns_64;
else
good_insns = good_insns_32;
@@ -1620,16 +1615,26 @@ static int push_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
*/
int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
{
+ enum insn_mode m = is_64bit_mm(mm) ? INSN_MODE_64 : INSN_MODE_32;
u8 fix_ip_or_call = UPROBE_FIX_IP;
struct insn insn;
int ret;
- ret = uprobe_init_insn(auprobe, &insn, is_64bit_mm(mm));
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ ret = insn_decode(&insn, auprobe->insn, sizeof(auprobe->insn), m);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return -ENOEXEC;
- if (can_optimize(&insn, addr))
+ /*
+ * No need to check instruction in uprobe_init_insn in case we
+ * are on top of optimizable nop10.
+ */
+ if (can_optimize(&insn, addr)) {
set_bit(ARCH_UPROBE_FLAG_CAN_OPTIMIZE, &auprobe->flags);
+ } else {
+ ret = uprobe_init_insn(auprobe, &insn);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
ret = branch_setup_xol_ops(auprobe, &insn);
if (ret != -ENOSYS)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 20:58 [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 01/13] uprobes/x86: Use proper mm_struct in __in_uprobe_trampoline Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 14:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 02/13] uprobes/x86: Remove struct uprobe_trampoline object Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-01 8:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 14:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-25 11:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-25 13:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-25 13:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 03/13] uprobes/x86: Allow to copy uprobe trampolines on fork Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 15:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 04/13] uprobes/x86: Unmap trampoline vma object in case it's unused Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 15:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-25 13:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-09 11:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-09 16:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-10 8:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 18:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-25 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-26 9:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-29 10:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-29 16:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-30 14:48 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 06/13] libbpf: Change has_nop_combo to work on top of nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 07/13] libbpf: Detect uprobe syscall with new error Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 08/13] selftests/bpf: Emit nop,nop10 instructions combo for x86_64 arch Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 09/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe syscall tests to use nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:30 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 10/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe/usdt trigger bench code " Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add reattach tests for uprobe syscall Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 11:32 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-28 11:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for uprobe nop10 red zone clobbering Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 10:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 12:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for forked/cloned optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 13:00 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-01 8:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-04 6:59 ` [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-26 5:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-23 19:11 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akPXPhXIf6Vz76Xc@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox