Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:48:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akPXPhXIf6Vz76Xc@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akKf511eknMCE0AB@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/29, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > @@ -265,6 +265,10 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
> >
> >  		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
> >  		switch (attr) {
> > +		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
> > +			if (insn->x86_64)
> > +				break;
> > +			fallthrough;
> >  		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_ES):
> >  		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_DS):
> >  		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_SS):
> >
> > or we could just skip it for nop10.. maybe that's better
> 
> Well, if you ask me I'd agree with the "maybe that's better" plan ;)
> I mean... I don't think that INAT_PFX_CS should be "special" in is_prefix_bad.
> 
> But, whatever you do - I agree, feel free to keep my r-b.

I ended up with the bigger change below, wdyt?

jirka


---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 92626fce06a9..521a120a0c78 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
 		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
 		switch (attr) {
 		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_ES):
+		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
 		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_DS):
 		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_SS):
 		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_LOCK):
@@ -275,15 +276,9 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn, bool x86_64)
+static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 {
-	enum insn_mode m = x86_64 ? INSN_MODE_64 : INSN_MODE_32;
 	u32 volatile *good_insns;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = insn_decode(insn, auprobe->insn, sizeof(auprobe->insn), m);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return -ENOEXEC;
 
 	if (is_prefix_bad(insn))
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
@@ -292,7 +287,7 @@ static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn, bool
 	if (insn_masking_exception(insn))
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 
-	if (x86_64)
+	if (insn->x86_64)
 		good_insns = good_insns_64;
 	else
 		good_insns = good_insns_32;
@@ -1620,16 +1615,26 @@ static int push_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
  */
 int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
+	enum insn_mode m = is_64bit_mm(mm) ? INSN_MODE_64 : INSN_MODE_32;
 	u8 fix_ip_or_call = UPROBE_FIX_IP;
 	struct insn insn;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = uprobe_init_insn(auprobe, &insn, is_64bit_mm(mm));
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	ret = insn_decode(&insn, auprobe->insn, sizeof(auprobe->insn), m);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return -ENOEXEC;
 
-	if (can_optimize(&insn, addr))
+	/*
+	 * No need to check instruction in uprobe_init_insn in case we
+	 * are on top of optimizable nop10.
+	 */
+	if (can_optimize(&insn, addr)) {
 		set_bit(ARCH_UPROBE_FLAG_CAN_OPTIMIZE, &auprobe->flags);
+	} else {
+		ret = uprobe_init_insn(auprobe, &insn);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	ret = branch_setup_xol_ops(auprobe, &insn);
 	if (ret != -ENOSYS)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-26 20:58 [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 01/13] uprobes/x86: Use proper mm_struct in __in_uprobe_trampoline Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 14:08   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 02/13] uprobes/x86: Remove struct uprobe_trampoline object Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:58     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-01  8:31       ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 14:36   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-25 11:19     ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-25 13:39     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-25 13:48       ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 03/13] uprobes/x86: Allow to copy uprobe trampolines on fork Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:58     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 15:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 04/13] uprobes/x86: Unmap trampoline vma object in case it's unused Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:57     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-24 15:36   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-25 13:39     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 05/13] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-09 11:44     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-09 16:43       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-10  8:18         ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-10 18:02           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-25 18:53   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-26  9:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-29 10:48     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-29 16:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-30 14:48         ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 06/13] libbpf: Change has_nop_combo to work on top of nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:57     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 07/13] libbpf: Detect uprobe syscall with new error Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 08/13] selftests/bpf: Emit nop,nop10 instructions combo for x86_64 arch Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 09/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe syscall tests to use nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27  9:58     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:30   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 10/13] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe/usdt trigger bench code " Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 10:46   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add reattach tests for uprobe syscall Jiri Olsa
2026-05-27 11:32   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-28 11:10     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for uprobe nop10 red zone clobbering Jiri Olsa
2026-05-26 21:46   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-27 10:26     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 12:46   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCHv4 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for forked/cloned optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-28 13:00   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-01  8:31     ` Jiri Olsa
2026-06-04  6:59 ` [PATCHv4 00/13] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for " Jiri Olsa
2026-06-08 20:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-26  5:44     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-23 19:11   ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akPXPhXIf6Vz76Xc@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox