* [PATCH] uprobes: Fix NULL pointer dereference in hprobe_expire()
@ 2026-07-29 14:44 Breno Leitao
2026-07-29 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Breno Leitao @ 2026-07-29 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa,
Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, James Clark, Masami Hiramatsu,
Oleg Nesterov, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, kernel-team,
stable, Breno Leitao
Forking a task that has a pending uretprobe can oops the kernel with a
NULL pointer dereference in the clone() path:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
RIP: 0010:hprobe_expire
CR2: 0000000000000018
Call Trace:
uprobe_copy_process
copy_process
kernel_clone
__x64_sys_clone
do_syscall_64
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
This was found on real hosts on Meta fleet.
I've got the impression that this is what is happening:
CPU 1 CPU 2 (traced task)
----- -------------------
hit uprobe, prepare_uretprobe():
hprobe LEASED, refcount >= 1
uprobe_unregister()
put_uprobe(): refcount -> 0
fork() -> dup_utask()
hprobe_expire(hprobe, true)
try_get_uprobe() -> NULL
get_uprobe(NULL) <-- Oops
Only take the extra reference when the uprobe is non-NULL; a NULL means
it is gone and is the correct value to return.
Fixes: dd1a7567784e ("uprobes: SRCU-protect uretprobe lifetime (with timeout)")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 07f69dd3093d5..950108f92079d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static struct uprobe *hprobe_expire(struct hprobe *hprobe, bool get)
if (try_cmpxchg(&hprobe->state, &hstate, uprobe ? HPROBE_STABLE : HPROBE_GONE)) {
/* We won the race, we are the ones to unlock SRCU */
__srcu_read_unlock(&uretprobes_srcu, hprobe->srcu_idx);
- return get ? get_uprobe(uprobe) : uprobe;
+ return get && uprobe ? get_uprobe(uprobe) : uprobe;
}
/*
---
base-commit: 3652b49adac266a3d27cb41cdfdb7d8790fc3633
change-id: 20260729-uprobe-b142b0863572
Best regards,
--
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix NULL pointer dereference in hprobe_expire()
2026-07-29 14:44 [PATCH] uprobes: Fix NULL pointer dereference in hprobe_expire() Breno Leitao
@ 2026-07-29 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-29 19:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2026-07-29 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Breno Leitao
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa,
Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, James Clark, Masami Hiramatsu,
Andrii Nakryiko, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, kernel-team, stable
On 07/29, Breno Leitao wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static struct uprobe *hprobe_expire(struct hprobe *hprobe, bool get)
> if (try_cmpxchg(&hprobe->state, &hstate, uprobe ? HPROBE_STABLE : HPROBE_GONE)) {
> /* We won the race, we are the ones to unlock SRCU */
> __srcu_read_unlock(&uretprobes_srcu, hprobe->srcu_idx);
> - return get ? get_uprobe(uprobe) : uprobe;
> + return get && uprobe ? get_uprobe(uprobe) : uprobe;
Well, looks "obviously correct". At least the current code is obviously
wrong, it even checks uprobe != NULL 3 lines above.
Andrii ?
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix NULL pointer dereference in hprobe_expire()
2026-07-29 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2026-07-29 19:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2026-07-29 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Breno Leitao, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland,
Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter,
James Clark, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, linux-perf-users,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, kernel-team, stable
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 9:02 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/29, Breno Leitao wrote:
> >
> > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static struct uprobe *hprobe_expire(struct hprobe *hprobe, bool get)
> > if (try_cmpxchg(&hprobe->state, &hstate, uprobe ? HPROBE_STABLE : HPROBE_GONE)) {
> > /* We won the race, we are the ones to unlock SRCU */
> > __srcu_read_unlock(&uretprobes_srcu, hprobe->srcu_idx);
> > - return get ? get_uprobe(uprobe) : uprobe;
> > + return get && uprobe ? get_uprobe(uprobe) : uprobe;
>
> Well, looks "obviously correct". At least the current code is obviously
> wrong, it even checks uprobe != NULL 3 lines above.
>
> Andrii ?
>
Yes, indeed, I'm more surprised this didn't come up much earlier
(probably it's rare enough to have uretprobe with refcnt at zero
during fork). The fix looks good, thanks!
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-29 19:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-29 14:44 [PATCH] uprobes: Fix NULL pointer dereference in hprobe_expire() Breno Leitao
2026-07-29 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-29 19:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox