From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Jiri Olsa' <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] x86/alternatives: Merge first and second step in text_poke_bp_batch
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:38:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c88cf8951a0d4f73901ba97a81ba3a12@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114140237.3506624-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
From: Jiri Olsa
> Sent: 14 January 2025 14:03
>
> hi,
> while checking on similar code for uprobes I was wondering if we
> can merge first 2 steps of instruction update in text_poke_bp_batch
> function.
>
> Basically the first step now would be to write int3 byte together
> with the rest of the bytes of the new instruction instead of doing
> that separately. And the second step would be to overwrite int3
> byte with first byte of the new instruction.
>
> Would that work or do I miss some x86 detail that could lead to crash?
I suspect it will 'crash and burn'.
Consider what happens if there is a cache-line boundary in the
middle of an instruction.
(Actually an instruction fetch boundary will do.)
cpu0: reads the old instructions from the old cache line.
cpu0: pipeline busy (or similar) so doesn't read the next cache line.
cpu1: writes the new instructions.
cpu0: reads the second cache line.
cpu0 now has a mix of the old and new instruction bytes.
Writing the int3 is safe - provided they don't return until
all the patching is over.
But between writing the int3 (over the first opcode byte) and
updating anything else I suspect you need something that does
a complete synchronise between the cpu that discards any bytes
in the decode pipeline as well as flushing the I-cache (etc).
I suspect that requires an acked IPI.
Very long cpu stalls are easy to generate.
Any read from PCIe will be slow (I've at fpga target that takes ~1us).
You'd need to be unlucky to be patching an instruction while one
was pending, but a DMA access might just be enough to cause grief.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 14:02 [RFC] x86/alternatives: Merge first and second step in text_poke_bp_batch Jiri Olsa
2025-01-14 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-14 14:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-01-14 15:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-01-15 18:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-01-14 14:38 ` David Laight [this message]
2025-01-16 11:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-01-16 5:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c88cf8951a0d4f73901ba97a81ba3a12@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox