From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shuai Xue" <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
palmer@dabbelt.com, pjw@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, oleg@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
james.clark@linaro.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
shuah@kernel.org, mpdesouza@suse.com, martin@kaiser.cx,
kmehltretter@gmail.com, oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com,
zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com, jkchen@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] riscv: stacktrace: Add frame record metadata
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 01:54:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206003@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110013750.36800-5-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] riscv: entry: use call instead of tail for handle_bad_stack()
--
commit ed05329452fecde9e16a00910af1efec91f2922b
Author: Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>
riscv: stacktrace: Add frame record metadata
This commit adds a metadata frame record to struct pt_regs and initializes
it across exception, overflow, boot, and task-creation entry boundaries
for frame-pointer stack unwinding.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> index 61b7a77166971..4c69132d59785 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
[ ... ]
> @@ -354,6 +376,19 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(handle_kernel_stack_overflow)
> REG_S s3, PT_BADADDR(sp)
> REG_S s4, PT_CAUSE(sp)
> REG_S s5, PT_TP(sp)
> +
> + /*
> + * Create a metadata frame record for the overflow pt_regs. The
> + * overflow path is entered from kernel context, so this is a nested
> + * pt_regs boundary and the unwinder can resume from the pre-overflow
> + * frame pointer saved in PT_S0.
> + */
> + REG_S zero, (S_STACKFRAME + FRAME_RECORD_FP)(sp)
> + REG_S zero, (S_STACKFRAME + FRAME_RECORD_RA)(sp)
> + li t0, FRAME_META_TYPE_PT_REGS
> + REG_S t0, S_STACKFRAME_TYPE(sp)
> + addi s0, sp, S_STACKFRAME + STACKFRAME_RECORD_SIZE
> +
> move a0, sp
> tail handle_bad_stack
> SYM_CODE_END(handle_kernel_stack_overflow)
[Severity: Medium]
Should this use "call handle_bad_stack" instead of "tail handle_bad_stack"?
Because tail does not update ra, handle_bad_stack()'s prologue saves a
frame record on the overflow stack that pairs the new s0 (pointing at the
overflow pt_regs metadata record) with the interrupted pre-overflow ra.
When panic() unwinds from handle_bad_stack(), the unwinder consumes
regs->ra before reaching the pt_regs metadata record, and if that return
address was hooked by function_graph or kretprobes, recovering it with the
overflow-stack fp fails and aborts the stack trace before reaching the
overflowed task stack.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110013750.36800-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 9:26 [PATCH v6 0/7] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] riscv: stacktrace: Add frame record metadata Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] riscv: stacktrace: disable KASAN and KCOV instrumentation for stacktrace.o Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] riscv: ftrace: always preserve s0 in dynamic ftrace register frame Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] riscv: stacktrace: introduce stack-bound tracking helpers Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] riscv: stacktrace: switch to frame-pointer based unwinder Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 18:59 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-10-10 3:38 ` Shuai Xue
2026-10-13 20:18 ` Martin Kaiser
2026-10-14 13:09 ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] riscv: Kconfig: enable HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and HAVE_LIVEPATCH Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] selftests/livepatch: Add RISC-V syscall wrapper prefix Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Martin Kaiser
2026-10-08 11:42 ` Shuai Xue
2026-10-12 8:44 ` Martin Kaiser
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] " Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] riscv: stacktrace: do not report the walker's own frame from arch_stack_walk() Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] riscv: Add KUnit test for stack trace start frames Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] riscv: ftrace: use the frame pointer as the function graph return-address cookie Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] riscv: stacktrace: Add frame record metadata Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] riscv: stacktrace: disable KASAN and KCOV instrumentation for stacktrace.o Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] riscv: ftrace: always preserve s0 in dynamic ftrace register frame Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] riscv: stacktrace: introduce stack-bound tracking helpers Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] riscv: stacktrace: switch to frame-pointer based unwinder Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 2:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] riscv: Kconfig: enable HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and HAVE_LIVEPATCH Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 2:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 1:37 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] selftests/livepatch: Add RISC-V syscall wrapper prefix Shuai Xue
2026-11-10 6:35 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Karl Mehltretter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206003@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jkchen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox