linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [uml-devel] Any complaints about parallel make in 2.6.10-rc?
@ 2004-12-07  5:28 Blaisorblade
  2004-12-07  5:47 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] " Christopher S. Aker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2004-12-07  5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: user-mode-linux-devel, user-mode-linux-user; +Cc: Christopher S. Aker

I've just tried doing this test on a clean tree 2.6.10-rc3, and it worked very 
well (I interrupted it after enough progress):

make ARCH=um -j10

Since somebody (maybe Christopher Aker) said that parallel make was broken in 
2.6.10-rc, I'm asking to report it in detail, if the complaint is correct.

-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-07  6:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-07  5:28 [uml-devel] Any complaints about parallel make in 2.6.10-rc? Blaisorblade
2004-12-07  5:47 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] " Christopher S. Aker
2004-12-07  6:25   ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-07  6:37     ` Blaisorblade

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox