* [uml-devel] UML and 2.6.x
@ 2004-04-12 22:36 Kris Van Hees
2004-04-13 17:13 ` BlaisorBlade
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kris Van Hees @ 2004-04-12 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: user-mode-linux-devel
I just found out (the hard way) that is seems like UML 2.6.4 cannot be compiled
on a host that is running 2.4.18, because the host-level code (in this case
arch/um/os-Linux/process.c) is depending on things in the installed include
files (unistd.h and the stuff it includes, specifically linux/unistd.h) that
are simply not there (__NR_tkill). Is this fact documented somewhere that I
overlooked?
Kris
--
Never underestimate a Mage with:
- the Intelligence to cast Magic Missile,
- the Constitution to survive the first hit, and
- the Dexterity to run fast enough to avoid being hit a second time.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] UML and 2.6.x
2004-04-12 22:36 [uml-devel] UML and 2.6.x Kris Van Hees
@ 2004-04-13 17:13 ` BlaisorBlade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: BlaisorBlade @ 2004-04-13 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: user-mode-linux-devel
Alle 00:36, martedì 13 aprile 2004, Kris Van Hees ha scritto:
> I just found out (the hard way) that is seems like UML 2.6.4 cannot be
> compiled on a host that is running 2.4.18, because the host-level code (in
> this case arch/um/os-Linux/process.c) is depending on things in the
> installed include files (unistd.h and the stuff it includes, specifically
> linux/unistd.h) that are simply not there (__NR_tkill). Is this fact
> documented somewhere that I overlooked?
It is not documented, but there have been several complaints. Comment out the
piece of code and un-comment the call to kill(), which will work perfectly.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&opÌk
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-13 17:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-12 22:36 [uml-devel] UML and 2.6.x Kris Van Hees
2004-04-13 17:13 ` BlaisorBlade
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).