From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: gboutwel <gboutwel@praize.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Still can't get an 2.6.6-rcX UML
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 19:35:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405111859.34514.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040504200555.13458.qmail@praize.com>
Alle 22:05, martedì 4 maggio 2004, gboutwel ha scritto:
> > Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Yes, what I mean is that the proper fix is probably to make
> it use the kernel
> > headers as it did before. Would you post the output of the
> failing make
> > command with the V=1 option added, to see the actual build
> command?
>
>
>
> Attached is the orgianl fail (before trying the symlink in /usr/include)
> with V=1 as uml-2.6.6-rc3-V.log
>
>
>
> Also, attached is the new fail (after trying the symlink in /usr/include)
> with an V=1 as uml-2.6.6-rc3.log
>
> > I think the 2nd thing holds, and that my suggestions is a workaround
>
> that
>
> > should work (I hope)...
>
> Don't look like it.
Well, it is an improvement; try disabling the SKAS mode in the UML .config and
post the new output, with V=1. However now I'm trying to solve the problem
myself with 2.6.6 - restart again with the patches I'm posting today (see the
"Patch for 2.6.6" thread).
Bye
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-11 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-04 20:05 [uml-devel] Still can't get an 2.6.6-rcX UML gboutwel
2004-05-11 17:35 ` BlaisorBlade [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-12 15:35 gboutwel
2004-04-30 18:31 gboutwel
2004-04-30 18:58 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-04-26 18:58 gboutwel
2004-04-26 13:46 gboutwel
2004-04-25 18:34 gboutwel
2004-04-26 1:50 ` Jeff Chua
2004-04-30 14:07 ` BlaisorBlade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405111859.34514.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=gboutwel@praize.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox