Re: [uml-devel] Still can't get an 2.6.6-rcX UML

[BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>]

Alle 20:31, venerdì 30 aprile 2004, gboutwel ha scritto:
> Blaisorblade wrote:

> > The problem is that:
> >
> > a) I think that file should include the "kernelspace" headers...
> >
> > however the kludges needed to do it are very fragile when Kbuild
>
> changes a
>
> > bit (this problem has repeatedly showed up against Linux 2.6).
>
> Ok.  If it where including kernelspace headers I don't think
> this would be a problem.

Yes, what I mean is that the proper fix is probably to make it use the kernel 
headers as it did before. Would you post the output of the failing make 
command with the V=1 option added, to see the actual build command?

> As I understand it SID installs as it's 'de facto' headers not
> 2.6, but 2.5.999-test7. See:
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/linux-kernel-headers

> And it would seem that this area (in kernel headers) has recently
> changed (when compared to 2.5) or up to this point UML builds
> have been going against kernel provided headers instead of the
> 2.5 headers debian's shipping.

I think the 2nd thing holds, and that my suggestions is a workaround that 
should work (I hope)...

Bye
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&opÌk
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel