From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 20:16:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409072016.01749.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040906193620.A8502@infradead.org>
On Monday 06 September 2004 20:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Could you please fix UML to not use ghash.h and remove that one before
> playing with new toys? This has been requested a few times now.
Yes, I can try - but I'd like to know the exact reason (I'm not developing UML
as long as Jeff does).
My idea is that ghash.h is just trivial boilerplate which does not deserve
generalized code, so that even rewriting the same exact code without using
those macros (and maybe embedding some assumptions about this usage) would be
a fine solution; also, there is just one user of it
(arch/um/kernel/physmem.c, with just one hash defined), so it shouldn't be
hard.
However, if the problem with ghash.h is different, I need more explainations.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-07 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-06 17:35 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-06 18:36 ` [uml-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-07 18:16 ` BlaisorBlade [this message]
2004-09-07 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-08 0:16 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200409072016.01749.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox