* [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline
@ 2004-09-06 17:35 blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-06 18:36 ` [uml-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: blaisorblade_spam @ 2004-09-06 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, blaisorblade_spam
Extraversion in arch/um/Makefile is not needed in mainline, but just for
separate patches; also, they should set it in the main Makefile, not elsewhere
(Jeff Garzik has just complained).
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
---
uml-linux-2.6.8.1-paolo/arch/um/Makefile | 9 ---------
1 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/um/Makefile~uml-no-extraversion-in-mainline arch/um/Makefile
--- uml-linux-2.6.8.1/arch/um/Makefile~uml-no-extraversion-in-mainline 2004-09-06 19:23:08.400492544 +0200
+++ uml-linux-2.6.8.1-paolo/arch/um/Makefile 2004-09-06 19:24:05.342835992 +0200
@@ -10,13 +10,6 @@ SHELL := /bin/bash
filechk_gen_header = $<
-# Recalculate MODLIB to reflect the EXTRAVERSION changes (via KERNELRELEASE)
-# The way the toplevel Makefile is written EXTRAVERSION is not supposed
-# to be changed outside the toplevel Makefile, but recalculating MODLIB is
-# a sufficient workaround until we no longer need architecture dependent
-# EXTRAVERSION...
-MODLIB := $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)/lib/modules/$(KERNELRELEASE)
-
core-y += $(ARCH_DIR)/kernel/ \
$(ARCH_DIR)/drivers/ \
$(ARCH_DIR)/sys-$(SUBARCH)/
@@ -44,8 +37,6 @@ SYS_DIR := $(ARCH_DIR)/include/sysdep-$
include $(ARCH_DIR)/Makefile-$(SUBARCH)
include $(ARCH_DIR)/Makefile-os-$(OS)
-EXTRAVERSION := $(EXTRAVERSION)-1um
-
# -Derrno=kernel_errno - This turns all kernel references to errno into
# kernel_errno to separate them from the libc errno. This allows -fno-common
# in CFLAGS. Otherwise, it would cause ld to complain about the two different
_
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline
2004-09-06 17:35 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline blaisorblade_spam
@ 2004-09-06 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-07 18:16 ` BlaisorBlade
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2004-09-06 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: blaisorblade_spam; +Cc: akpm, jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel
Could you please fix UML to not use ghash.h and remove that one before
playing with new toys? This has been requested a few times now.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline
2004-09-06 18:36 ` [uml-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
@ 2004-09-07 18:16 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: BlaisorBlade @ 2004-09-07 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: user-mode-linux-devel; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, akpm, jdike, linux-kernel
On Monday 06 September 2004 20:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Could you please fix UML to not use ghash.h and remove that one before
> playing with new toys? This has been requested a few times now.
Yes, I can try - but I'd like to know the exact reason (I'm not developing UML
as long as Jeff does).
My idea is that ghash.h is just trivial boilerplate which does not deserve
generalized code, so that even rewriting the same exact code without using
those macros (and maybe embedding some assumptions about this usage) would be
a fine solution; also, there is just one user of it
(arch/um/kernel/physmem.c, with just one hash defined), so it shouldn't be
hard.
However, if the problem with ghash.h is different, I need more explainations.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline
2004-09-07 18:16 ` BlaisorBlade
@ 2004-09-07 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-08 0:16 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2004-09-07 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: BlaisorBlade; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, hch, jdike, linux-kernel
BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> On Monday 06 September 2004 20:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Could you please fix UML to not use ghash.h and remove that one before
> > playing with new toys? This has been requested a few times now.
> Yes, I can try - but I'd like to know the exact reason (I'm not developing UML
> as long as Jeff does).
>
> My idea is that ghash.h is just trivial boilerplate which does not deserve
> generalized code, so that even rewriting the same exact code without using
> those macros (and maybe embedding some assumptions about this usage) would be
> a fine solution; also, there is just one user of it
> (arch/um/kernel/physmem.c, with just one hash defined), so it shouldn't be
> hard.
>
> However, if the problem with ghash.h is different, I need more explainations.
Take one look at ghash.h and you'll see why we don't want it in the tree.
ghash was removed for a while and it was not intended that it come back -
it snuck back by accident. Please, rewrite that piece of UML so we can
again remove ghash.h.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline
2004-09-07 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2004-09-08 0:16 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2004-09-08 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: BlaisorBlade, user-mode-linux-devel, hch, linux-kernel
akpm@osdl.org said:
> Please, rewrite that piece of UML so we can again remove ghash.h.
I am, I'll send you a patch when I'm done.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-07 23:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-06 17:35 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: no extraversion in arch/um/Makefile for mainline blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-06 18:36 ` [uml-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-07 18:16 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-08 0:16 ` Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox