linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] [patch 0/17] UML updates, which must be merged before 2.6.9
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 03:05:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410120305.24675.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)

Andrew, sorry for sending these patches so late, but they are (mostly 
one-liners) needed to fix either warnings in compilation (the patches are 
safe) or probable bugs which are created by these warnings.

The Makefile patch are of another kind: actually, when I send that couple of 
patches merged before -rc3, they were against my tree and absolutely 
incorrect against Linus tree; sorry for not checking that; in fact UML does 
not link with neither -rc3 nor -rc4 (also due to a compilation bug I already 
fixed for -rc3). However, this Makefile fixes fix everything, have been 
longly tested in public (hanging both in my tree, in SuSE UML tree and in 
Jeff Dike's tree).

Finally, I'm sending a patch for a network corruption which is very nasty; 
it's a one-liner, a resync against the copied original code and I've actually 
tested it works perfectly.

So, please, even if now we are in a hurry after -rc4, merge them. It's the 
only possibility for UML to actually work "out of the box".

Oh well, and sorry for sending "[uml-devel] [patch 4/6] uml: don't declare 
cpu_online - fix compilation error" - I just noticed it's included in 
2.6.9-rc4-mm1. All the rest applies without even any offsets to that tree, 
too.

Thanks a lot for your help.
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-12  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-12  1:05 BlaisorBlade [this message]
     [not found] ` <200410130040.i9D0eA3P004443@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
2004-10-14 22:44   ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/17] UML updates, which must be merged before 2.6.9 BlaisorBlade
2004-10-18 21:16     ` Jeff Dike
2004-10-18 22:20       ` BlaisorBlade
2004-10-22  1:32         ` Jeff Dike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200410120305.24675.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
    --to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox