* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS
[not found] <200410272223.i9RMNg921807@mail.osdl.org>
@ 2004-10-28 18:49 ` Blaisorblade
2004-10-28 19:29 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-10-28 21:50 ` roland
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2004-10-28 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, cw; +Cc: jdike, user-mode-linux-devel, LKML
On Thursday 28 October 2004 00:27, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
> This is required to get UML to build with only TT mode.
Drop that - the fix is in my tree currently, I'll forward it soon. And the
fix, instead of #ifdef'ing it out, adds the support for using TT & SYSEMU.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS
2004-10-28 18:49 ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS Blaisorblade
@ 2004-10-28 19:29 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-10-28 21:19 ` Blaisorblade
2004-10-28 21:50 ` roland
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wedgwood @ 2004-10-28 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: akpm, jdike, user-mode-linux-devel, LKML
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:49:42PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Drop that - the fix is in my tree currently, I'll forward it
> soon. And the fix, instead of #ifdef'ing it out, adds the support
> for using TT & SYSEMU.
SKAS / SYSEMU are entirely uninteresting right now until the host OS
support for these gets merged
i really don't think it's a good enough reason to hold other things up
and i'd prefer to see the fixes go in as-is and further updates ontop
of these
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS
2004-10-28 19:29 ` Chris Wedgwood
@ 2004-10-28 21:19 ` Blaisorblade
2004-10-28 22:20 ` roland
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2004-10-28 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wedgwood; +Cc: akpm, jdike, user-mode-linux-devel, LKML
On Thursday 28 October 2004 21:29, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:49:42PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Drop that - the fix is in my tree currently, I'll forward it
> > soon. And the fix, instead of #ifdef'ing it out, adds the support
> > for using TT & SYSEMU.
> SKAS / SYSEMU are entirely uninteresting right now until the host OS
> support for these gets merged
Well, this is completely questionable. Even if SKAS3 will never be merged in
mainline on the host side, the SKAS3 support in UML has already been merged.
And I think SYSEMU will be much more welcome than those patches (in fact,
it's completely independent from the SKAS patch).
For an earlier discussion, see:
http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20030106_199.html#4
And even if SKAS3 will not be merged, SKAS4 will, and the current UML SKAS
code should need just a very few changes. While having the code in mainline
is important to get it fixed with API changes.
> i really don't think it's a good enough reason to hold other things up
> and i'd prefer to see the fixes go in as-is and further updates ontop
> of these
This would be generally right, but for now, please hold on until next -rc.
Sorry for the problem and thanks for the help!
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS
2004-10-28 18:49 ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS Blaisorblade
2004-10-28 19:29 ` Chris Wedgwood
@ 2004-10-28 21:50 ` roland
2004-10-28 23:45 ` Blaisorblade
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: roland @ 2004-10-28 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: user-mode-linux-devel
hi!
i remember i had problems building SKAS w/o TT - has this been fixed already ?
regards
roland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Blaisorblade" <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: <akpm@osdl.org>; <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: <jdike@addtoit.com>; <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 8:49 PM
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS
> On Thursday 28 October 2004 00:27, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> > From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
>
> > This is required to get UML to build with only TT mode.
>
> Drop that - the fix is in my tree currently, I'll forward it soon. And the
> fix, instead of #ifdef'ing it out, adds the support for using TT & SYSEMU.
> --
> Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
> Linux registered user n. 292729
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
> For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
> setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
> today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
> User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS
2004-10-28 21:19 ` Blaisorblade
@ 2004-10-28 22:20 ` roland
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: roland @ 2004-10-28 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wedgwood; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel
Hi !
> SKAS / SYSEMU are entirely uninteresting right now until the host OS
> support for these gets merged
I think I have to disagree: Many people who use UML have no problem with the fact, that they need to patch & recompile their host
kernel. Sure it would be nicer, if the stock kernel would have this out "of the box", but at least some distros (at least SuSE - are
there others?) have Skas3 already merged into _their_ kernel.
regards
Roland
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS
2004-10-28 21:50 ` roland
@ 2004-10-28 23:45 ` Blaisorblade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2004-10-28 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: user-mode-linux-devel; +Cc: roland
On Thursday 28 October 2004 23:50, roland wrote:
> hi!
>
> i remember i had problems building SKAS w/o TT - has this been fixed
> already ?
In Jeff's tree IIRC, in fact I can build that way easily. For STATIC_LINK
instead it's more difficult - either load-low or newer binutils broke it.
> regards
> roland
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-28 23:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200410272223.i9RMNg921807@mail.osdl.org>
2004-10-28 18:49 ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 2/7] uml: Build fix for TT w/o SKAS Blaisorblade
2004-10-28 19:29 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-10-28 21:19 ` Blaisorblade
2004-10-28 22:20 ` roland
2004-10-28 21:50 ` roland
2004-10-28 23:45 ` Blaisorblade
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).