linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?
@ 2005-01-16 17:38 Rob Landley
  2005-01-17  4:00 ` Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rob Landley @ 2005-01-16 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: user-mode-linux-devel

I'm under the impression blaisorblade isn't going to continue his "stable" 
tree now that patches are flowing easily into main, but the hang I'm seeing 
in 2.6.9-bb persists (I tried mem=64M but that didn't help either).  Probably 
something small and simple to fix, but I haven't tracked it down yet...

I can't get 2.6.11-rc1 ARCH=um to compile.  (Fixed the first build break to 
receive a more elaborate one shortly thereafter, which is not a good sign...)

Is there a recommended tree I should be looking at?

Rob


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-17  2:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-16 17:38 [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch? Rob Landley
2005-01-17  4:00 ` Jeff Dike
2005-01-17  2:29   ` Frank Sorenson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox