Re: [uml-devel] Recent patches of note

[Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:09:34PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> +struct task_struct;
> +extern void arch_switch(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *to);

Is the task_struct; needed, considering that there is get_task returning
one a few lines higher?

> +	/* XXX: This is bogus, it's already done in local_irq_enable. Or does
> +	 * ordering matters? */

No, my signal handler initialization is confused and redundant in places.
Just fix that and resend.

> Fix the do_fork calling convention: normal arch pass the regs and the new sp
> value to do_fork instead of NULL.
> 
> Currently the arch-independent code ignores these values, while the UML code   
> (actually it's copy_thread) gets the right values by itself.
> 
> With this patch, things are fixed up.
>     
> Low-priority.

But long-overdue.  This one is applied.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel