From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: "Sleeping in atomic section" with ubd aio patch
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509162120.18101.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050914211808.GA11567@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 23:18, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:00:39PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Assuming it can be done, it'd be ok.
> >
> > However, why have we already dequeued the request?
>
> It is easier than removing segments from the request and finally
> dequeueing the request when it is finally empty.
Why can't you just move that exact call later, without removing segments?
However, even if it's "easier" this way, IMHO it's still easier to defer the
removal than to readd the thing into the queue (assuming the driver is
supposed to do this).
Not that I've looked well at the code or at the API recently. I'm busy with
other stuff.
> > Looking for examples, via grep blkdev_dequeue_request drivers/ide/*.c and
> > going opening drivers/ide/ide-io.c, I found blkdev_dequeue_request()
> > called *after* end_that_request_first(), while there it's called before.
> > A comment in blk_start_pre_flush() says there's some freedom, but
> > probably leaving the request in the queue would be ok....
> There is a good amount of freedom. The driver is given a set of
> requests, and has the job of making them happen.
> Jeff
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-16 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-13 18:01 [uml-devel] "Sleeping in atomic section" with ubd aio patch Blaisorblade
2005-09-14 19:22 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2005-09-14 20:00 ` Blaisorblade
2005-09-14 21:18 ` Jeff Dike
2005-09-16 19:20 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509162120.18101.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox