From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
kravetz@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lhms <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:41:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511022341.50524.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051103052649.GA16508@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 23:26, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:28:35PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > With fragmentation reduction and prezeroing, UML suddenly gains the
> > option of calling madvise(DONT_NEED) on sufficiently large blocks as A) a
> > fast way of prezeroing, B) a way of giving memory back to the host OS
> > when it's not in use.
>
> DONT_NEED is insufficient. It doesn't discard the data in dirty
> file-backed pages.
I thought DONT_NEED would discard the page cache, and punch was only needed to
free up the disk space.
I was hoping that since the file was deleted from disk and is already getting
_some_ special treatment (since it's a longstanding "poor man's shared
memory" hack), that madvise wouldn't flush the data to disk, but would just
zero it out. A bit optimistic on my part, I know. :)
> Badari Pulavarty has a test patch (google for madvise(MADV_REMOVE))
> which does do the trick, and I have a UML patch which adds memory
> hotplug. This combination does free memory back to the host.
I saw it wander by, and am all for it. If it goes in, it's obviously the
right thing to use. You may remember I asked about this two years ago:
http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/Dec/0919.html
And a reply indicated that SVr4 had it, but we don't. I assume the "naming
discussion" mentioned in the recent thread already scrubbed through this old
thread to determine that the SVr4 API was icky.
http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/Dec/0955.html
> Jeff
Rob
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-03 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1130917338.14475.133.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <20051102172729.9E7C.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com>
[not found] ` <43687C3D.7060706@yahoo.com.au>
2005-11-02 23:28 ` [uml-devel] Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19 Rob Landley
2005-11-03 5:26 ` Jeff Dike
2005-11-03 5:41 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2005-11-04 3:26 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-04 15:50 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 17:18 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-04 17:44 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 19:10 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-04 20:41 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 20:57 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 23:42 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-05 1:45 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-05 5:23 ` Jeff Dike
2005-11-05 5:45 ` Jeff Dike
2005-11-05 11:30 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-05 23:44 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-06 17:18 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-08 0:32 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-08 15:56 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-09 0:50 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-05 18:57 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511022341.50524.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox