linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	kravetz@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lhms <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:50:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511040950.59942.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511040426.47043.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>

On Thursday 03 November 2005 21:26, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > I was hoping that since the file was deleted from disk and is already
> > getting _some_ special treatment (since it's a longstanding "poor man's
> > shared memory" hack), that madvise wouldn't flush the data to disk, but
> > would just zero it out.  A bit optimistic on my part, I know. :)
>
> I read at some time that this optimization existed but was deemed obsolete
> and removed.
>
> Why obsolete? Because... we have tmpfs! And that's the point. With
> DONTNEED, we detach references from page tables, but the content is still
> pinned: it _is_ the "disk"! (And you have TMPDIR on tmpfs, right?)

If I had that kind of control over environment my build would always be 
deployed in (including root access), I wouldn't need UML. :)

(P.S. The default for Ubuntu "Horny Hedgehog" is no.  The only tmpfs mount 
is /dev/shm, and /tmp is on / which is ext3.  Yeah, I need to upgrade my 
laptop...)

> I guess you refer to using frag. avoidance on the guest

Yes.  Moot point since Linus doesn't want it.

> (if it matters for 
> the host, let me know). When it will be present using it will be nice, but
> currently we'd do madvise() on a page-per-page basis, and we'd do it on
> non-consecutive pages (basically, free pages we either find or free or
> purpose).

Might be a performance issue if that gets introduced with per-page 
granularity, and how do you avoid giving back pages we're about to re-use?  
Oh well, bench it when it happens.  (And in any case, it needs a tunable to 
beat the page cache into submission or there's no free memory to give back.  
If there's already such a tuneable, I haven't found it yet.)

Rob


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-04 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1130917338.14475.133.camel@localhost>
     [not found] ` <20051102172729.9E7C.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com>
     [not found]   ` <43687C3D.7060706@yahoo.com.au>
2005-11-02 23:28     ` [uml-devel] Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19 Rob Landley
2005-11-03  5:26       ` Jeff Dike
2005-11-03  5:41         ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04  3:26           ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-04 15:50             ` Rob Landley [this message]
2005-11-04 17:18               ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-04 17:44                 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 19:10                   ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-04 20:41                     ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 20:57                       ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 23:42                       ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-05  1:45                         ` Rob Landley
2005-11-05  5:23                           ` Jeff Dike
2005-11-05  5:45                       ` Jeff Dike
2005-11-05 11:30                         ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-05 23:44                           ` Rob Landley
2005-11-06 17:18                             ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-08  0:32                               ` Rob Landley
2005-11-08 15:56                                 ` Blaisorblade
2005-11-09  0:50                                   ` Rob Landley
2005-11-05 18:57                         ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200511040950.59942.rob@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).