Re: [uml-devel] Making UML Single Threader

[Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>]

On Tuesday 08 November 2005 08:09, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 07 November 2005 23:13, Can Sar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to make a 1 thread version of UML that does not need to
> > be able to support user level programs.

> Why?

He may well be running Valgrind or something similar (Valgrind doesn't like us 
using clone(), even if it accepts fork()).

Ah, btw, given his address, I wonder if he's related at all with some project 
like "Stanford Checker" or a relative of it.

> Did you ever read Rik van Reil's list of the dumbest patches he's ever
> seen? This is the first entry in the list:
>
> http://www.surriel.com/potm/apr2001.shtml

Sorry I don't see your point, Rob - it's a really different thing.

> Define "port".  (Have you looked at mmu-less linux?  Are you saying you
> haven't got a timer interrupt and can't fake up some kind of green-threads
> approach like people managed to do under _DOS_?)

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo 
http://it.messenger.yahoo.com



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel