From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: TLS support - status - need for re-testing
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:14:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060323211424.GA6130@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603230317.48384.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:17:45AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Jeff, I've looked at all other patches _names_ and they're patches which I
> already have, so I shouldn't have lost any other changes.
I think I didn't change any of your patches - any changes I made got
their own patches, so you should be safe.
> Plus, I've just done a couple of other cleanups of the TLS code, removing dead
> code which was there for experiments; I've implemented 2.4 host detection (I
> hope I've not forgot to check the host_supports_tls variable anywhere), and
> I'm ripping out global-ldt-sem which I longly hated (and which isn't easy to
> avoid).
Do you have a set of patches which are candidates for akpm? I'm
looking at
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.15-bb6/broken-out/series
and that seems unsuitable, as some patches seem to reverse earlier
ones.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-23 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-23 2:17 [uml-devel] TLS support - status - need for re-testing Blaisorblade
2006-03-23 11:29 ` [uml-devel] " Antoine Martin
2006-03-23 21:14 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2006-03-23 23:44 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 1:51 ` Jeff Dike
2006-03-24 10:39 ` Antoine Martin
2006-03-24 11:44 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 11:43 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 4:17 ` Jeff Dike
2006-03-24 11:43 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 17:32 ` Jeff Dike
2006-03-24 18:44 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060323211424.GA6130@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=antoine@nagafix.co.uk \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox