From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix UML build on i386 Ubuntu Dapper
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:47:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060628004756.GC4488@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060627183128.GA4488@us.ibm.com>
On 27.06.2006 [11:31:28 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 27.06.2006 [16:56:13 +0200], Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 00:02, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > Hi Jeff,
> > >
> > > I run an x86_64 kernel with i386 userspace (Ubuntu Dapper) and decided
> > > to try out UML today. I found that UML wasn't quite aware of biarch
> > > compilers (which Ubuntu i386 ships). A fix similar to what was done for
> > > x86_64 should probably be committed (see
> > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113425940204010&w=2).
> >
> > Ok, it seemed strange but I understand the stuff... that's very
> > interesting as this is the setup I'd wished to have since ages. I'll
> > switch to it ASAP...
>
> Indeed :)
>
> > > Without the FLAGS changes, the build will fail at a number of places and
> > > without the LINK change, the final link will fail.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > The first hunk (#undef i386) should be unnecessary given you specify
> > -m64 (add it to CPPFLAGS too). Also it can/could be problematic for
Hrm, I somehow overlooked the CPPFLAGS bit. Is it necessary? That wasn't
changed for x86_64 and having not changed it for UML, it doesn't appear
to have prevented the build from working on both x86_64 and i386
SUBARCHs here.
Thanks,
Nish
--
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-28 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-26 22:02 [uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix UML build on i386 Ubuntu Dapper Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-27 14:56 ` Blaisorblade
2006-06-27 18:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-28 0:47 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2006-06-28 10:13 ` Blaisorblade
2006-06-29 20:56 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-29 21:49 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-07-07 0:52 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-30 0:29 ` Paolo Giarrusso
2006-06-30 1:05 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-28 2:11 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-28 2:54 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-28 3:43 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-28 3:50 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060628004756.GC4488@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox